Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Mar 8, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 8, 2022 - May 3, 2022
Date Accepted: May 5, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Multi-operator Self-exclusion as a Harm Reduction Measure in Problem Gambling: Retrospective Clinical Study on Gambling Relapse Despite Self-exclusion

Håkansson A, Åkesson G

Multi-operator Self-exclusion as a Harm Reduction Measure in Problem Gambling: Retrospective Clinical Study on Gambling Relapse Despite Self-exclusion

JMIR Ment Health 2022;9(8):e37837

DOI: 10.2196/37837

PMID: 35984678

PMCID: 9440409

Multi-operator self-exclusion is a viable harm reduction option for problem gamblers, but many self-excluders relapse despite self-exclusion on a predominantly online gambling market

  • Anders Håkansson; 
  • Gunny Åkesson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling is a common harm reduction option for individuals with gambling problems. Multi-operator, nationwide self-exclusion services are rare, and a system introduced in the highly online-based gambling market of Sweden is a rare and recent example. However, where online casino and online betting are the predominating gambling types in those seeking treatment, the risk of breaching one’s own self-exclusion through overseas online operators may be high.

Objective:

This study aims to assess the prevalence of nationwide Spelpaus (‘gambling break’) self-exclusion, and the prevalence of gambling despite self-exclusion, in patients seeking treatment for gambling disorder in 2021.

Methods:

Health care documentation of recent treatment seekers (January 1 through September 1, 2021, N=85, 73 percent men) in a Swedish treatment facility was reviewed for data regarding problematic gambling types reported, history of self-exclusion, and history of breaching of that self-exclusion.

Results:

Common problem gambling types were online casino (66 percent) and sports betting (26 percent). All women reported online casino gambling. Self-exclusion history was common (81 percent). Among self-excluders, gambling despite self-exclusion was common (68 percent), most commonly on non-licensed online gambling sites.

Conclusions:

The nationwide, multi-operator self-exclusion service of Sweden appears to reach many patients with gambling disorder. However, remaining gambling options in an online gambling setting present a major challenge despite self-exclusion. This recent data calls for further treatment efforts and for potential improvements in services aiming to help voluntary self-excluders abstain from gambling.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Håkansson A, Åkesson G

Multi-operator Self-exclusion as a Harm Reduction Measure in Problem Gambling: Retrospective Clinical Study on Gambling Relapse Despite Self-exclusion

JMIR Ment Health 2022;9(8):e37837

DOI: 10.2196/37837

PMID: 35984678

PMCID: 9440409

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.