Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Feb 13, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 10, 2022 - Apr 7, 2022
Date Accepted: May 14, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Survey Study

Hägglund M, Scandurra I

Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Survey Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(2):e37192

DOI: 10.2196/37192

PMID: 35737444

PMCID: 9264119

Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: a Qualitative Study

  • Maria Hägglund; 
  • Isabella Scandurra

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient portals are increasingly being implemented throughout the world to ensure patients with timely access to their health data, including patients’ access to their electronic health records (EHR). In Sweden, the e-service Journalen is a national patient accessible EHR (PAEHR), accessible online via the national patient portal. User characteristics and perceived benefit of using a PAEHR will influence behavioural intention to use and adoption, but poor usability that increases effort expectancy can have a negative impact. It is therefore of interest to further explore how users of the PAEHR Journalen perceive its usability and usefulness.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to explore how the users of the Swedish PAEHR experience the usability of the system, and to identify specific usability problems that may need to be addressed in the future.

Methods:

A survey study was conducted to elicit opinions and experiences of patients using Journalen. The data was collected from June to October 2016. The questionnaire included a free-text question regarding the usability of the system, and the responses to this question was analysed using content analysis with a socio-technical framework as guidance when grouping identified usability issues.

Results:

During the survey period, 423 141 users logged into Journalen, of which 2587 completed the survey (unique users that logged in; response rate, 0.61%, 2587/423 141). In total 186 respondents (7% of 2587) provided a free text comment to the usability questions. The analysis resulted in 19 categories, that could be grouped under 7 of the 8 dimensions in Sittig and Singhs socio-technical framework. The most frequently mentioned problems related to regional access limitations, structure and navigation of the patient portal, and language and understanding.

Conclusions:

Although the end-users of the PAEHR Journalen where overall satisfied with its usability, they also experienced important challenges when accessing their records. In order for all patients to be able to reap the benefits of record access, it is essential to both understand the usability challenges they encounter and more broadly how policies, regulations and technical implementation decisions impact the usefulness of record access. The results presented here are specific for the Swedish PAEHR Journalen, but also provide important insights on how design and implementation of record access can be improved in any context.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hägglund M, Scandurra I

Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Survey Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(2):e37192

DOI: 10.2196/37192

PMID: 35737444

PMCID: 9264119

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.