Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2022
Date Accepted: May 12, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Prevalence of COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors in US Adults (August-December 2020): Nationwide Household Probability Survey

Sanchez T, Hall E, Siegler A, Asrani R, Bradley H, Fahimi M, Lopman B, Luisi N, Nelson K, Sailey C, Shioda K, Valentine-Graves M, Sullivan P

Prevalence of COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors in US Adults (August-December 2020): Nationwide Household Probability Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e37102

DOI: 10.2196/37102

PMID: 38055314

PMCID: 10702689

Prevalence of COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors of United States Adults, August-December 2020: Nationwide Household Probability Survey

  • Travis Sanchez; 
  • Eric Hall; 
  • Aaron Siegler; 
  • Radhika Asrani; 
  • Heather Bradley; 
  • Mansour Fahimi; 
  • Benjamin Lopman; 
  • Nicole Luisi; 
  • Kristin Nelson; 
  • Charles Sailey; 
  • Kayoko Shioda; 
  • Mariah Valentine-Graves; 
  • Patrick Sullivan

ABSTRACT

Background:

COVID-19 mitigation behaviors, such as wearing masks, maintaining social distancing, and practicing hand hygiene have been and will remain vital to slowing the pandemic.

Objective:

Provide United States prevalence estimates of COVID-19 mitigation behaviors.

Methods:

We used baseline survey data from a nationwide household probability sample enrolled August-December 2020 to generate weighted estimates of mitigation behaviors: wearing masks, maintaining social distancing, and practicing hand hygiene. Weighted logistic regression explored differences in mitigation behaviors by demographics. Latent class analyses (LCA) identified patterns in mitigation behaviors.

Results:

Among 4,654 participants, period prevalence of consistent mask wearing was 71.1% (sample-weighted 95% confidence interval [CI] 68.8-73.3%), consistent social distancing 42.9% (95% CI: 40.5-45.3%), frequent washing hands 55.0% (CI 52.3-57.7%), and frequent hand sanitizing 21.5% (CI 19.4-23.8%). Mitigation behaviors were more prevalent among women, older persons, Black or Hispanic persons, not college graduates, or service-oriented workers. LCA identified an optimal mitigation class who consistently practiced all behaviors (67.0% of US adults), a low mitigation class inconsistently practiced all behaviors (20.6%), and a class that had optimal masking and social distancing but high frequency of hand hygiene (12.3%).

Conclusions:

Despite high prevalence of COVID-19 mitigation behaviors, there were likely millions who were not consistently practicing these behaviors during the time of highest COVID-19 incidence to date. Public health authorities should also consider addressing the disparities in COVID-19 mitigation practices through more targeted prevention messaging.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sanchez T, Hall E, Siegler A, Asrani R, Bradley H, Fahimi M, Lopman B, Luisi N, Nelson K, Sailey C, Shioda K, Valentine-Graves M, Sullivan P

Prevalence of COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors in US Adults (August-December 2020): Nationwide Household Probability Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e37102

DOI: 10.2196/37102

PMID: 38055314

PMCID: 10702689

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.