Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 25, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 7, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Characterizing the Prevalence of Obesity Misinformation, Factual Content, Stigma, and Positivity on the Social Media Platform Reddit Between 2011 and 2019: Infodemiology Study

Pollack CC, Emond JA, O'Malley AJ, Byrd A, Green P, Miller KE, Vosoughi S, Gilbert-Diamond D, Onega T

Characterizing the Prevalence of Obesity Misinformation, Factual Content, Stigma, and Positivity on the Social Media Platform Reddit Between 2011 and 2019: Infodemiology Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(12):e36729

DOI: 10.2196/36729

PMID: 36583929

PMCID: 9840103

Characterizing the Prevalence of Obesity Misinformation, Factual Content, Stigma, and Positivity on the Social Media Platform Reddit Between 2011 and 2019: Infodemiology Study

  • Catherine C. Pollack; 
  • Jennifer A. Emond; 
  • A. James O'Malley; 
  • Anna Byrd; 
  • Peter Green; 
  • Katherine E. Miller; 
  • Soroush Vosoughi; 
  • Diane Gilbert-Diamond; 
  • Tracy Onega

ABSTRACT

Background:

Reddit is a popular social media platform that has faced scrutiny for inflammatory language against those with obesity, yet there has been no comprehensive analysis of its obesity-related content.

Objective:

To quantify the presence of four types of obesity-related content on Reddit (misinformation, stigma, positivity, and facts) and identify psycholinguistic features that may be enriched within each one.

Methods:

All sentences (n = 764,179) containing “obese” or “obesity” from top-level comments (n = 689,447) made on non-age-restricted subreddits (i.e., smaller communities within Reddit) between 2011 and 2019 that contained one of a series of keywords were evaluated. Four types of common natural language processing features were extracted to train a machine learning classifier to label each sentence as one of the four content categories or ambiguous/other.

Results:

After removing ambiguous sentences, 3,610 sentences were labeled as misinformation, 14,366 sentences were labeled as stigma, 14,799 were labeled as positivity, and 68,276 were labeled as facts. Each category had markers that distinguished it from other categories within the data as well as an external corpus. For example, misinformation had a higher average percent of negations (β = 3.71, 95% CI: 3.53, 3.90, P<.001) but lower average number of words greater than six letters (β = -1.47, 95% CI: -1.85, -1.10, P<.001) relative to facts. Stigma had a higher proportion of swear words (β=1.83, 95% CI: 1.62, 2.04, P<.001) but lower proportion of first-person singular pronouns (β = -5.30, 95% CI: -5.44, -5.16, P<.001) relative to positivity.

Conclusions:

There are distinct psycholinguistic properties between types of obesity-related content on Reddit that can be leveraged to rapidly identify deleterious content with minimal human intervention. Future work should assess whether these properties are shared across languages and other social media.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pollack CC, Emond JA, O'Malley AJ, Byrd A, Green P, Miller KE, Vosoughi S, Gilbert-Diamond D, Onega T

Characterizing the Prevalence of Obesity Misinformation, Factual Content, Stigma, and Positivity on the Social Media Platform Reddit Between 2011 and 2019: Infodemiology Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(12):e36729

DOI: 10.2196/36729

PMID: 36583929

PMCID: 9840103

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.