Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: iProceedings

Date Submitted: Jan 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of the Leishmania Surveillance System, Yemen, 2021

Aldaeri M, Alhaidari S, Anam L

Evaluation of the Leishmania Surveillance System, Yemen, 2021

iProc 2022;8(1):e36595

DOI: 10.2196/36595

Evaluation of Leishmania Surveillance System, Yemen, 2021

  • Magdi Aldaeri; 
  • Sami Alhaidari; 
  • Labiba Anam

ABSTRACT

Background:

Control of preventive chemotherapy-targeted neglected tropical diseases (PC-NTDs) depends on strengthened health systems. Efficient health information systems provide stimulus to reaching the sustainable development goal aimed at ending PC-NTD epidemics. However, there is a limited assessment of surveillance system functions linked to PC-NTDs and hinged on optimal performance of surveillance system attributes.

Objective:

The study aimed to assess the usefulness and performance of the system, estimate the strength, weaknesses points of the National Leishmania Control Program (NLCP).

Methods:

We followed the updated six steps of the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention guidelines (CDC) for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Data were collected using in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders at the central level and semi-structural questionnaire format at the peripheral level. We used questions (Yes, No) to assess the usefulness, and a 5-Likert scale to measure the attributes. The final score was interpreted as poor (<60), average (60-80), and good (>80).

Results:

NLCP seemed to be useful (86%); some of its objectives were met. The system has average performance in flexibility (78%), simplicity (64%), acceptability (80%), and data quality (65%). Stability and timeliness were poor performance (33%), (8%) respectively. The overall performance of NLCP was poor (55%). Continuation of the system was the strongest point while the lack of governmental and agency funds was the weak point.

Conclusions:

The NLCP was found to be useful regarding the attributes, although simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, and data quality were average; however, stability and timeliness were poor. Governmental financial support to the program is highly recommended. In addition, creating a database for staff at the peripheral level, expanding the number of health facilities that serve as Leishmania units are prerequisites.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Aldaeri M, Alhaidari S, Anam L

Evaluation of the Leishmania Surveillance System, Yemen, 2021

iProc 2022;8(1):e36595

DOI: 10.2196/36595

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.