Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 13, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 8, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

New Heat and Moisture Exchangers for Laryngectomized Patients in Germany: Mixed Methods Study on the Expected Effectiveness

Ahmed A, Mewes JC, Boot IW, Vrijhoef HJ

New Heat and Moisture Exchangers for Laryngectomized Patients in Germany: Mixed Methods Study on the Expected Effectiveness

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e36401

DOI: 10.2196/36401

PMID: 36630171

PMCID: 9878367

New heat and moisture exchangers for laryngectomized patients in Germany: a mixed methods study on the expected effectiveness

  • Anam Ahmed; 
  • Janne C. Mewes; 
  • Iris W.A. Boot; 
  • Hubertus J.M. Vrijhoef

ABSTRACT

Background:

Notwithstanding the benefits of Heat and Moisture Exchangers (HMEs) in both clinical research and practice, a gap exists between the optimal physiological humidification levels by the nasal function and the humidification capacity by HMEs for patients after total laryngectomy. In this study, five new HMEs (Provox® Life™) specialized for situational use with improved humidification capacities were evaluated.

Objective:

1. To evaluate the effectiveness of existing HMEs; 2. to assess the potential effectiveness of the new HMEs; 3. to elicit expert judgments on the expected effectiveness and impact on healthcare use of the new HMEs.

Methods:

First, a rapid literature review (RLR) was performed identifying evidence on the clinical outcomes, health outcomes, and complications of HMEs in laryngectomised patients. Second, semi-structured interviews with German experts (n=4) were conducted to validate the findings of the RLR and to identify reasonable expectations regarding the potential of the new HMEs. Third, structured expert elicitation (SEE) among German experts (n=19) was used to generate quantitative evidence on the expected effectiveness of the new HMEs on clinical and health outcomes.

Results:

The RLR included ten studies and demonstrated that HME use by patients has advantages compared to no HME use concerning breathing resistance, tracheal dryness and irritation, mucus production and plugging, frequency of cough and forced expectorations, sleep quality, voice quality, use of physiotherapy, tracheobronchitis and/or pneumonia episodes, and ultimately quality of life and patient satisfaction. From the expert interviews and the SEE, it was found that on average, experts expect that the new HMEs compared to second generation HMEs will lead to a decrease in tracheal dryness/irritation (51%±24% of patients), mucus plug events (33%±32% of patients), mucus production (53%±22% of patients), physiotherapy (0.74±0.70 days), pulmonary infections (34%±32%), and an increase or improvement in speech quality (25%±23% of patients), social contacts (13%±18%), QoL (33%±30%) and patient satisfaction (44%±30%). An improvement in breathing (53%±28% of patients) and shortness of breath (48%±25% of patients) is expected. The average number of daily cough periods is expected to be 2.95 (±1.61) and the number of forced expectorations 2.46 (±1.42). Experts expect that on average less than half of patients will experience sleeping problems (48%±22%), and psychosocial problems (24%±20%).

Conclusions:

According to German experts, it is expected that the new HMEs with improved humidification levels, will lead to additional (clinical) effectiveness on pulmonary health, and an improved overall QoL of patients compared to HMEs currently available.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ahmed A, Mewes JC, Boot IW, Vrijhoef HJ

New Heat and Moisture Exchangers for Laryngectomized Patients in Germany: Mixed Methods Study on the Expected Effectiveness

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e36401

DOI: 10.2196/36401

PMID: 36630171

PMCID: 9878367

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.