Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 22, 2021
Date Accepted: Mar 1, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mobile Apps for Dietary and Food Timing Assessment: Evaluation for Use in Clinical Research

Gioia S, Vlassac IM, Babazadeh D, Fryou NL, Do E, Robbins R, Dashti HS, Lane JM

Mobile Apps for Dietary and Food Timing Assessment: Evaluation for Use in Clinical Research

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e35858

DOI: 10.2196/35858

PMID: 37327038

PMCID: 10337248

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating Mobile Apps For Dietary and Food Timing Assessment For Use in Research and Clinical Assessment

  • Siena Gioia; 
  • Irma M Vlassac; 
  • Demsina Babazadeh; 
  • Noah L Fryou; 
  • Elizabeth Do; 
  • Rebecca Robbins; 
  • Hassan S Dashti; 
  • Jacqueline M Lane

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Over the last decade, health apps have become an increasingly popular tool utilized by clinicians and researchers to track food consumption and exercise. However, as consumer apps have primarily focused on tracking dietary intake and exercise, many lack technological features to facilitate the capture of critical food timing details. To determine a viable app that recorded both dietary intake and food timing for use in our clinical study, we evaluated the timestamp data, usability, privacy policies, accuracy of nutrient estimates, and general features of 11 mobile apps for dietary assessment. Apps were selected using a keyword search of related terms and the following apps were reviewed: Bitesnap, Cronometer, DiaryNutrition, DietDiary, FoodDiary, FoodView, Macros, MealLogger, myCircadianClock, MyFitnessPal, and MyPlate. Our primary goal was identifying apps that record food timestamps, which 8 of the reviewed apps did (73%). Of those, only 4/11 (36%) allowed users to edit the timestamps, an important feature. Next, we sought to evaluate the usability of the apps, using the System Usability Scale (SUS) across 2 days, with 82% of the apps receiving favorable scores for usability (9/11 apps). To enable use in research and clinic settings, the privacy policies of each app were systematically reviewed using common criteria with 1 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant app (Cronometer). Furthermore, protected health information is collected by 9/11 (81%) of the apps. Lastly, to assess the accuracy of nutrient estimates generated by these apps, we selected 4 sample food items and one researcher’s 3-day dietary record to input into each app. The caloric and macronutrient estimates of the apps were compared to nutrient estimates provided by a registered dietitian using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR). Compared to the 3-day food record, the apps were found to consistently underestimate calories and macronutrients compared to NDSR. Overall, we find the Bitesnap app to provide flexible dietary and food timing functionality capable for research or clinical use with the majority of apps lacking in necessary food timing functionality or user privacy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gioia S, Vlassac IM, Babazadeh D, Fryou NL, Do E, Robbins R, Dashti HS, Lane JM

Mobile Apps for Dietary and Food Timing Assessment: Evaluation for Use in Clinical Research

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e35858

DOI: 10.2196/35858

PMID: 37327038

PMCID: 10337248

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.