Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Dec 15, 2021
Date Accepted: May 23, 2022
User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis with the Course-of-action framework
ABSTRACT
Background:
Co-creation of e-health solutions with potential users, or co-design, can foster acceptability of the solution. However, the co-design research approach requires substantial investment, and projects are not always fruitful.
Objective:
We address this issue by describing a co-design project focusing on participant experience, what was significant from their point-of-view.
Methods:
We used a qualitative approach for this study. Data were collected on a co-design research project aiming to support the help-seeking process of caregivers of functionally dependent older persons. The methodology was based on Dewey’s perspective of experience and the course-of-action theorical framework. Data collection was done in two phases: 1) participant observation and recording of sessions; 2) participant autoconfrontation interviews using the recording of the sessions. We interviewed 20 participants out of 74. We analysed data through nonexclusive emerging categorization of themes with the constant comparative method.
Results:
Four emerging themes were identified. The perceptions of extrinsic constraints and the effects of the situation were the most important theme and were central, affecting other themes (frustrating interactions with others, learning together and destabilisation). Cooccurrences between codes allowed a visual and narrative understanding of what was significant for participant during this project. Reflecting on our results, we provide potential affordances to shape the experience of participants in co-design.
Conclusions:
Potential users are essential for the co-design research approach. Researchers and designers should seek to offer them a positive and contributive experience.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.