Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Dec 8, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 28, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Van Veenendaal H, Peters LJ, Ubbink DT, Stubenrouch FE, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PL, Vreugdenhil G, Hilders CG

Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(4):e35543

DOI: 10.2196/35543

PMID: 35383572

PMCID: 9021945

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Effectiveness of individual feedback and coaching on shared decision-making consultations in oncology care: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

  • Haske Van Veenendaal; 
  • Loes J Peters; 
  • Dirk T Ubbink; 
  • Fabienne E Stubenrouch; 
  • Anne M Stiggelbout; 
  • Paul LP Brand; 
  • Gerard Vreugdenhil; 
  • Carina GJM Hilders

ABSTRACT

Background:

Shared decision-making (SDM) is particularly important in oncology since many treatments involve serious side effects, and treatment decisions involve a trade-off of benefits and risks. However, implementation of SDM in oncology care is challenging and clinicians state that it is difficult to apply SDM in their actual workplace. Training clinicians is known to be an effective means of improving SDM, but is considered time-consuming.

Objective:

This study addresses the effectiveness of an individual SDM training program, using the concept of deliberate practice.

Methods:

This multicentre single-blinded randomized clinical trial will be performed in 12 Dutch hospitals. Clinicians involved in decisions with oncology patients are invited to participate in the study and are allocated to the control group or intervention group. All clinicians will record 3 decision-making processes, with 3 different oncology patients. Clinicians in the intervention group receive the SDM-intervention: completing E-learnings, reflecting on feedback reports, doing a self-assessment and defining 1-3 personal learning questions, and participating in face-to-face coaching. Clinicians in the control group do not receive the SDM-intervention until the end of the study. The primary outcome will be the extent in which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process, as scored using the OPTION-5 instrument. As secondary outcome patients will rate their perceived involvement in the decision-making and the duration of the consultations will be registered.

Results:

We hypothesize that clinicians exposed to this intervention are more likely to adopt SDM behaviours than clinicians who do not. A secondary aim is to evaluate whether patients perceive more involvement in the decision-making process.

Conclusions:

This theory-based and blended approach will increase our knowledge about effective and feasible training methods for clinicians in the field of SDM. The intervention will be tailored to the context of individual clinicians and will target knowledge, attitude and skills of clinicians. Patients are involved in the design and implementation of the study. Clinical Trial: This trial is retrospectively registered (Netherlands Trial Registry number NL9647; August 03, 2021, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9647). All participating clinicians and their patients will receive information about the study and complete an informed consent form beforehand. Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Board (medical research ethics committee Delft and Leiden, the Netherlands (N20.170)).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Van Veenendaal H, Peters LJ, Ubbink DT, Stubenrouch FE, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PL, Vreugdenhil G, Hilders CG

Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(4):e35543

DOI: 10.2196/35543

PMID: 35383572

PMCID: 9021945

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.