Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: iProceedings

Date Submitted: Dec 3, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 3, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Validated Questionnaire to Evaluate Primary Care Pediatrician Satisfaction With the Use of Teledermatology

Palazón Cabanes JC, Juan Carpena G, Berbegal García L, Martínez Miravete T, Palazón Cabanes B, Betlloch Mas I

A Validated Questionnaire to Evaluate Primary Care Pediatrician Satisfaction With the Use of Teledermatology

iProc 2021;7(1):e35438

DOI: 10.2196/35438

PMID: 27739494

PMCID: 5064357

A Validated Questionnaire to Evaluate Primary-Care-Pediatrician Satisfaction in the Use of Teledermatology

  • Juan Carlos Palazón Cabanes; 
  • G Juan Carpena; 
  • L Berbegal García; 
  • T Martínez Miravete; 
  • B Palazón Cabanes; 
  • I Betlloch Mas

ABSTRACT

Background:

Teledermatology (TD) is a branch of the telemedicine focused on the evaluation of cutaneous lesions by dermatologists remotely, in order to avoid unnecessary consults that could be otherwise resolved by this method, and to shorten time for promptly evaluation of cutaneous diseases.

Objective:

To create and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction in the use of TD among primary care pediatricians (PCPs) and to test the questionnaire in our health area before performing an intervention for optimization of the TD.

Methods:

We first created a questionnaire based on previous publications, Then, an expert consultation was made before writing the final version of the questionnaire. We tested it twice on pediatricians of different health areas with a 1-month gap between both administrations. Internal consistency, reproducibility and validity were evaluated. Finally, the validated questionnaire was tested on the PCPs of our health area, analyzing their responses.

Results:

We registered 38 responses. 30 PCPs (78,9%) actively used TD several times a month or a year. None of them use TD daily. Technical and health care quality of TD was mostly considered as good or very good. TD was similar or even better than face-to-face evaluation for most PCPs, while 7,9% thought TD was worse than conventional consult. Most of PCPs considered TD as an effective, self-learning and trustable tool. 10,5% identified that pictures performed by mobile phones were a barrier for its use, as it affects to patient privacy. Technical problems, absence of exclusive devices for TD image taking, and delayed answers are some other barriers detected to overcome. Nonetheless, all PCPs were satisfied with TD and all of them would continue or start to use this tool.

Conclusions:

TD has demonstrated to be an efficient tool as it reduces waiting time and costs for dermatology evaluation, and increases satisfaction among professionals. With our questionnaire, we verified that quality, usability, efficacy and satisfaction related to TD in our health area had a positive consideration between PCPs in general terms, but there are still barriers to overcome.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Palazón Cabanes JC, Juan Carpena G, Berbegal García L, Martínez Miravete T, Palazón Cabanes B, Betlloch Mas I

A Validated Questionnaire to Evaluate Primary Care Pediatrician Satisfaction With the Use of Teledermatology

iProc 2021;7(1):e35438

DOI: 10.2196/35438

PMID: 27739494

PMCID: 5064357

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.