Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Dec 3, 2021
Date Accepted: May 20, 2022
TOWARDS AN ECOLOGICALLY VALID CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN CLINICAL SETTINGS: THE NEED FOR SYSTEMS THINKING, AI ACCOUNTABILITY, DECISION MAKING, TRUST, AND PATIENT SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS IN SAFEGUARDING AI AND CLINICIANS
ABSTRACT
The healthcare management and the medical practitioner literature are missing a descriptive conceptual framework for understanding the dynamic and complex interactions between clinicians and Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Since most of the existing literature have been investigating AIs’ performance and effectiveness from a statistical (analytical) standpoint, there exist lack of studies ensuring AIs’ ecological validity. In this study, we derive a framework that specifically focuses on the interaction between AI and clinicians. The proposed framework builds upon well-established human factors models such as the technology acceptance model, and expectancy theory. The framework can be used to perform quantitative analyses to capture how clinician-AI interactions may vary based on human factors such as expectancy, workload, trust, cognitive variables related to absorptive capacity and bounded rationality, and concerns for patient safety. The proposed framework, if leveraged can help in improving AI acceptance, and use while safeguarding the patients. Overall, this study discusses the concepts, propositions, and assumptions of the multidisciplinary decision-making literature constituting a socio-cognitive approach extending the theories of distributed cognition and, in so doing, shall account for the ecological validity of AI.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.