A 9-Year Teledermoscopy Service: Retrospective Service Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
A teledermoscopy service was established in January 2010, where patients attended nurse-led clinics for imaging of lesions of concern and remote diagnosis by a dermatologist.
Objective:
The study aimed to review the number of visits, patient characteristics, the efficiency of the service, and the diagnoses made.
Methods:
We evaluated the waiting time and diagnosis of skin lesions for all patient visits from 1st January 2010 to 31st May 2019. The relationships between patient characteristics and the diagnosis of melanoma were specifically analysed.
Results:
The teledermoscopy clinic was attended by 6479 patients for 11005 skin lesions on 8805 occasions. Statistically significant risk factors for the diagnosis of melanoma/melanoma in situ were male sex, European ethnicity and Fitzpatrick skin type 2. Attendance was maximal during 2015 and 2016. The seasonal variation in visits 2011-2018 revealed a consistent peak at the end of summer and a dip at the end of winter. In the year 2010, 306 patients attended; 76% of these were discharged to primary care and 24% were referred to hospital for specialist assessment. For patients diagnosed by the dermatologist with suspected melanoma from 1st Jan 2010 to 31st May 2019, the median waiting time for an imaging appointment was 44.5 days (average 57.9 days, range 8-218 days). The most common lesions diagnosed were benign naevus (27%), benign keratosis (23%) and keratinocytic cancer (15%); melanoma was suspected in 5% of referred lesions (Figure 1). The positive predictive value of melanoma/melanoma in situ was 61.1% (320 true positives and 203 false positives). The number needed to treat (NNT) (i.e. the ratio of the total number of excisions to the number with a histological diagnosis of melanoma/melanoma in situ) was 2.02.
Conclusions:
Diagnoses were comparable to the experience of other teledermoscopy services. Teledermoscopy using a nurse-led imaging clinic can provide efficient and convenient access to dermatology by streamlining referrals to secondary care and prioritising patients with skin cancer for treatment.
Citation
Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.