Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 12, 2021
Date Accepted: May 27, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Practices, Perceived Benefits, and Barriers Among Medical Students and Health Care Professionals Regarding the Adoption of eHealth in Clinical Settings: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Nguyen LH, Nguyen LTK, Nguyen HSA, Nguyen TT, Dam VTA, Vu GT, Vu TTM, Tran BX, Latkin CA, Ho RC, Ho CS

Practices, Perceived Benefits, and Barriers Among Medical Students and Health Care Professionals Regarding the Adoption of eHealth in Clinical Settings: Cross-sectional Survey Study

JMIR Med Educ 2022;8(3):e34905

DOI: 10.2196/34905

PMID: 36098992

PMCID: 9516362

Adopting E-Health Approaches in Clinical Settings: Practices, Perceived Benefits and Barriers among Medical Students and Healthcare Professionals

  • Long Hoang Nguyen; 
  • Lien Thi Khanh Nguyen; 
  • Hao Si Anh Nguyen; 
  • Tham Thi Nguyen; 
  • Vu Trong Anh Dam; 
  • Giang Thu Vu; 
  • Thuc Thi Minh Vu; 
  • Bach Xuan Tran; 
  • Carl A. Latkin; 
  • Roger C.M. Ho; 
  • Cyrus S.H. Ho

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health (eHealth) is increasingly becoming an indispensable part of health practice and policy-making strategies. However, the use of eHealth tools in clinical practice and perceptions of eHealth among medical students and health professionals in Vietnam are not well understood.

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate the perceptions and practices of eHealth and its associated factors among medical students and health professionals.

Methods:

An online cross-sectional study was conducted on 523 medical students and health professionals. Information about practices and perceived barriers and benefits of eHealth application in clinical practices was collected. Multivariate Tobit and Logistic Regression Models were utilized for determining associated factors with perceptions and practices.

Results:

61.6% of participants used eHealth tools in clinical practices, with moderate levels of eHealth literacy. The score of perceived benefits of eHealth tools was low. The most common barrier for eHealth utilization was “Human resource for IT” (45.9%), followed by “Security and risk control capacity” (43.2%) and “No training in eHealth application” (42.6%). Age, eHealth literacy, and using the internet for updating medical knowledge were positively associated with using eHealth tools in clinical practices.

Conclusions:

eHealth tools were moderately used in clinical practices, and the benefits of eHealth were underestimated among health professionals and medical students in Vietnam. Renovating the current medical education curriculum to integrate eHealth principles should be required to equip essential skills for health professionals and medical students in rapid digital transformation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nguyen LH, Nguyen LTK, Nguyen HSA, Nguyen TT, Dam VTA, Vu GT, Vu TTM, Tran BX, Latkin CA, Ho RC, Ho CS

Practices, Perceived Benefits, and Barriers Among Medical Students and Health Care Professionals Regarding the Adoption of eHealth in Clinical Settings: Cross-sectional Survey Study

JMIR Med Educ 2022;8(3):e34905

DOI: 10.2196/34905

PMID: 36098992

PMCID: 9516362

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.