Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2021
Date Accepted: May 27, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Accuracy of a Nonexercise Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness Equation without Physical Activity Status
ABSTRACT
Background:
Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. Most healthcare settings use some type of electronic health record system (EHRs). However, many EHRs do not have CRF, or physical activity data collected, thereby limiting the types of investigations and analyses that can be done.
Objective:
Develop a nonexercise equation without physical activity to estimate and classify CRF (in METs) using variables commonly available in EHRs.
Methods:
Participants were 42,676 healthy adults (21.4% women) from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study examined from 1974 to 2005. Nonexercise estimated CRF (NEECRF) was based on sex, age, measured body mass index, measured resting heart rate, measured resting blood pressure, and smoking status. A maximal treadmill test measured CRF.
Results:
After conducting nonlinear feature augmentation, separate linear regression models were used for males and females to calculate correlation and regression coefficients. Cross-classification of actual and estimated CRF was performed using the lowest tertile as the low-fit category. R’s were 0.70 (mean deviation 1.33) and 0.65 (MD 1.23) for men and women, respectively. The models explained 48% (standard error of the estimate 1.70) and 42% (SEE 1.56) variance in CRF for men and women. Correct category classification for low CRF was found in 77.2% of men and 74.9% of women.
Conclusions:
The regression models developed in the present study provided useful estimation and classification of CRF in a large population of men and women. The models may provide a valid method for estimating CRF derived from EHRs.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.