Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 22, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 22, 2021 - Dec 17, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of Social Support and Quitting Smoking in an Online Community Forum: Study Involving Content Analysis

Struik L, Khan S, Assoiants A, Sharma R

Assessment of Social Support and Quitting Smoking in an Online Community Forum: Study Involving Content Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(1):e34429

DOI: 10.2196/34429

PMID: 35023834

PMCID: 8796047

Social support and quitting smoking: Content analysis of an online community forum

  • Laura Struik; 
  • Shaheer Khan; 
  • Art Assoiants; 
  • Ramona Sharma

ABSTRACT

Background:

A key factor in successfully reducing and quitting smoking, as well as preventing smoking relapse is access to and engagement with social support. Recent technological advances have made it possible for smokers to access social support via online community forums. While community forums associated with smoking cessation interventions are now common practice, there is a gap in understanding how and when the different types of social support (emotional, esteem, informational, tangible, and network) are exchanged on such forums. Community forums that entail “superusers” (a key marker of a successful forum), like QuitNow, are ripe for exploring and leveraging promising social support exchanges on these platforms.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to characterize the posts made on the QuitNow community forum at different stages in the quit journey, and determine when and how the social support constructs are present within the posts.

Methods:

A total of 506 posts (including original and response posts) were collected. Using conventional content analysis, the original posts were coded inductively to generate categories and sub-categories, and the responses were coded deductively according to the five types of social support. Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel software.

Results:

Overall, individuals were most heavily engaged on the forum during the first month of quitting, which then tapered off in the subsequent months. In relation to the original posts, the majority of them fit into the categories of sharing quit successes, quit struggles, updates, quit strategies, and desires to quit. Asking for advice and describing smoke-free benefits were the least represented categories. In relation to the responses, encouragement (emotional), compliment (esteem), and suggestion/advice (informational) consistently remained the most prominent types of support throughout all quit stages. Companionship (network) maintained a steady downward trajectory over time.

Conclusions:

The findings of this study highlight the complexity of how and when different types of social support are exchanged on the QuitNow community forum. These findings provide directions for how social support can be more strategically employed and leveraged in these online contexts to support smoking cessation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Struik L, Khan S, Assoiants A, Sharma R

Assessment of Social Support and Quitting Smoking in an Online Community Forum: Study Involving Content Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(1):e34429

DOI: 10.2196/34429

PMID: 35023834

PMCID: 8796047

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.