Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Oct 18, 2021
Date Accepted: Apr 28, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Smartphone apps related to shoulder pain using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS): A Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Successful rehabilitation of musculoskeletal (MSK) pain requires more than medical input alone. Conservative treatment including physiotherapy and exercise therapy can be an effective way of decreasing pain associated with MSK pain. However, face-to-face appointments are currently not feasible. New mobile technologies such as mobile health (mHealth) in the form of an app on your smartphone can be a solution to this problem. In many cases, these apps are not backed by scientific literature, therefore it is important that they are reviewed and quality assessed.
Objective:
The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of apps related to shoulder pain using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
Methods:
This study included 25 free and paid apps from the Apple Store and the Google Play Store. Five reviewers were involved in the evaluation process. A descriptive analysis of the MARS results provided a general overview of the quality of the apps.
Results:
Overall, app quality was generally low with an average star rating of 1.97 out of 5. The best scores were in the ‘Functionality’ and ‘Aesthetics’ sections, scoring poorer in the ‘Engagement’ and ‘Information’ sections. The apps were also rated poorly in the ‘Subjective Quality’ section.
Conclusions:
In general, the apps were well built technically and were aesthetically pleasing. However, the apps failed to provide quality information to the user which led to a lack of engagement. Most of the apps weren’t backed by scientific literature and those that contained scientific references were vastly out of date. Future apps would need to address these concerns whilst taking simple measures to ensure quality control. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.