Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 6, 2021
Date Accepted: May 2, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Awareness, Acceptability, and Perceived Effectiveness of Text-Based Therapy Among Graduate Students: Cross-sectional Study

Blair SA, Brockmann AN, Arroyo KM, Carpenter CA, Ross KM

Awareness, Acceptability, and Perceived Effectiveness of Text-Based Therapy Among Graduate Students: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(7):e34102

DOI: 10.2196/34102

PMID: 35797098

PMCID: 9305396

Awareness, Acceptability, and Perceived Effectiveness of Text-Based Therapy Among Graduate Students: Cross-sectional Study

  • Samari A. Blair; 
  • Andrea N. Brockmann; 
  • Kelsey M Arroyo; 
  • Chelsea A Carpenter; 
  • Kathryn M Ross

ABSTRACT

Background:

Research has suggested that there is a mental health crisis occurring among graduate students in the United States. Moreover, many students go without effective treatment due to the limited availability of mental and behavioral health resources on college campuses. Text-based therapy may represent a viable method for increasing access to mental health support for graduate students, but little is known regarding its acceptability in this population.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to assess how graduate students perceive text-based therapy and their likelihood of seeking out this form of therapy.

Methods:

Two hundred and sixty-five graduate students (63.0% female, 64.1% White, mean ± SD age = 28.3 ± 5.1 years) completed an online survey assessing perceptions of text-based therapy and their likelihood of seeking out this form of therapy.

Results:

Over half of participants (52.5%) were not aware text-based therapy existed, however 65.3% reported that they would consider using text-based services if available. In comparison to face-to-face therapy, participants reported being less likely to seek out text-based therapy and perceived it as less effective (Ps < .001). Qualitative results indicated that participants were concerned about the ability to effectively communicate and build rapport through text-based therapy and thought that this modality may be more effective for some mental and behavioral health concerns versus others. Moreover, participants noted that text-based therapy would be best implemented as a way to supplement, rather than replace, face-to-face services.

Conclusions:

Taken together, results of the current study suggest that text-based therapy holds potential to increase access to and utilization of mental and behavioral health services; however, graduate students remain concerned about its efficacy and the optimal methods of implementation. Future research should investigate how therapeutic processes (e.g., effective communication and rapport-building) can be facilitated in digital environments and how text-based therapy could best be implemented to supplement and extend, rather than replace, face-to-face services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Blair SA, Brockmann AN, Arroyo KM, Carpenter CA, Ross KM

Awareness, Acceptability, and Perceived Effectiveness of Text-Based Therapy Among Graduate Students: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(7):e34102

DOI: 10.2196/34102

PMID: 35797098

PMCID: 9305396

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.