Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Sep 21, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 21, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 20, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of the First Year(s) of Physicians Collaboration on an Interdisciplinary Electronic Consultation Platform in the Netherlands: Mixed Methods Observational Study

Sanavro S, van der Worp H, Jansen D, Koning P, Blanker MH

Evaluation of the First Year(s) of Physicians Collaboration on an Interdisciplinary Electronic Consultation Platform in the Netherlands: Mixed Methods Observational Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(2):e33630

DOI: 10.2196/33630

PMID: 35363155

PMCID: 9015779

‘Evaluation of the First Year(s) of Physicians’ Collaboration on an Interdisciplinary Electronic Consultation Platform in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods observational study.

  • Sanne Sanavro; 
  • Henk van der Worp; 
  • Danielle Jansen; 
  • Paul Koning; 
  • Marco H Blanker

ABSTRACT

Background:

Consultation between General Practitioners (GPs) and hospital specialists can be challenging due to mutual unavailability and lack of interactive communication tools. By contrast, team-based case collaboration on a patient-centered network of healthcare professionals could facilitate communication and knowledge transfer. A digital interactive platform was developed to support this new way of collaboration.

Objective:

Purpose. To describe the development of the digital consultation platform (PRISMA) to connect general GPs with hospital specialists via the Siilo application and to evaluate the first year of use, including consultations, topic diversity, and number of participating physicians.

Methods:

Methods. We conducted a mixed-methods observational study, analyzing qualitative and quantitative data for cases posted on the platform between June 2018 and May 2020. Any GP can post questions to an interdisciplinary group of secondary care specialists, with the platform designed to facilitate discussion and knowledge exchange for all users.

Results:

Results. In total, 3674 cases were posted by 424 GPs across 16 specialisms. Most questions and answers concerned diagnosis, non-medical treatment, and medication. Mean response time was 76 minutes (range, 44–252). An average of three users engaged with each case (up to seven specialists). Almost half of the internal medicine cases received responses from at least two specialisms in secondary care, contrasting with about one-fifth for dermatology. Of note, the growth in consultations was steepest for dermatology.

Conclusions:

Conclusions. Digital consultations offer the possibility for GPs to receive quick responses when seeking advice. The interdisciplinary approach of PRISMA creates opportunities for digital patient-centered networking. Clinical Trial: none


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sanavro S, van der Worp H, Jansen D, Koning P, Blanker MH

Evaluation of the First Year(s) of Physicians Collaboration on an Interdisciplinary Electronic Consultation Platform in the Netherlands: Mixed Methods Observational Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(2):e33630

DOI: 10.2196/33630

PMID: 35363155

PMCID: 9015779

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.