Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Oct 7, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Providing Accessible Recreation Outdoors—User-Driven Research on Standards (PARCOURS): Protocol for a Multiphase Study

Prescott M, Routhier F, Labbé D, Grandisson M, Mahmood A, Morales E, Best KL, Mostafavi MA, Borisoff J, Gamache S, Sawatzky B, Miller WC, Bulk LY, Robillard JM, Ford HT, Seetharaman KR, Mortenson WB

Providing Accessible Recreation Outdoors—User-Driven Research on Standards (PARCOURS): Protocol for a Multiphase Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(3):e33611

DOI: 10.2196/33611

PMID: 35357324

PMCID: 9015767

Providing Accessible ReCreation Outdoors - User-driven Research on Standards (PARCOURS): A study protocol

  • Mike Prescott; 
  • François Routhier; 
  • Delphine Labbé; 
  • Marie Grandisson; 
  • Atiya Mahmood; 
  • Ernesto Morales; 
  • Krista L. Best; 
  • Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi; 
  • Jaimie Borisoff; 
  • Stéphanie Gamache; 
  • Bonita Sawatzky; 
  • William C. Miller; 
  • Laura Yvonne Bulk; 
  • Julie M. Robillard; 
  • Hailey-Thomas Ford; 
  • Kishore Rajaram Seetharaman; 
  • W Ben Mortenson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Canada’s national parks are world-renowned. However, despite recent attempts to improve access, many are not accessible to people with disabilities. With the advent of provincial and federal legislation, standards are being developed to assist with the design and management of parks.

Objective:

The overarching objective of this study is to inform accessibility standards for federal parks that meet the needs of all park visitors, regardless of ability. The specific objectives of this study are to: 1. Identify park accessibility standards that exist internationally; 2. Identify the accessibility challenges that people with disabilities face in park environments; 3. Prioritize and recommend accessibility standards for national parks.

Methods:

A three-phase approach will be used to achieve study objectives. In the first phase, a scoping review of the existing accessibility standards will be conducted. The second phase will include an objective audits of trails and features in six parks, three in western Canada and three in eastern Canada, as well as mobile interviews with 24 diverse participants in each region regarding their experiences of and recommendations for improving the park’s accessibility. In the final phase, a Delphi participatory consensus-development process will be used, based on the data gathered in the first two phases, to prioritize recommendations for standards.

Results:

We expect to find gaps in existing standards that do not account for the diverse range of accessibility requirements that people with disabilities have for visiting parks. We also expect to find that existing standards, on their own, may not be enough to ensure equitable access to all the experiences and amenities that parks have to offer. Development of subsequent guidelines and best practices may be necessary to address complex scenarios for which standards may not be the best approach to ensuring accessibility.

Conclusions:

The participatory and mixed-methods approaches used in this study will provide rich insights for developing accessible park standards that consider the diverse needs of people with disabilities. The findings will also support the development or enhancement of park standards at all levels of government.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Prescott M, Routhier F, Labbé D, Grandisson M, Mahmood A, Morales E, Best KL, Mostafavi MA, Borisoff J, Gamache S, Sawatzky B, Miller WC, Bulk LY, Robillard JM, Ford HT, Seetharaman KR, Mortenson WB

Providing Accessible Recreation Outdoors—User-Driven Research on Standards (PARCOURS): Protocol for a Multiphase Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(3):e33611

DOI: 10.2196/33611

PMID: 35357324

PMCID: 9015767

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.