Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Aug 25, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 25, 2021 - Sep 2, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 21, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Four decades of military posttraumatic stress: Protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment approaches and efficacy
ABSTRACT
Background:
Over 85% of active members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) have been exposed to potentially traumatic events linked to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the time of transition to civilian life, as high as one in eight Veterans has a diagnosis of PTSD. Given high rates of PTSD in military and Veteran populations, the provision of effective treatment with considerations for their unique challenges and lived experiences is critical in the support of their mental health and well-being.
Objective:
The current paper overviews the protocol for conducting a meta-analysis and systematic review substantiating evidence of treatment approaches and effectiveness in treating military-related PTSD.
Methods:
The PROSPERO pre-registered meta-analysis is being conducted in accordance with PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycInfo, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. After removal of duplicates, a total of 12,002 studies were screened for inclusion.
Results:
Effect sizes will be computed based on changes in PTSD symptom scores over time across studies using validated PTSD scales. A multi-level meta-analysis will examine the overall effects, between-studies effects, and within-studies effects of available evidence for PTSD treatments in military populations. Effect sizes will be compared between pharmacotherapeutic, psychotherapeutic, and alternative/emerging treatment interventions. Finally, meta-regression and sub-group analyses will explore the moderating roles of clinical characteristics (e.g., PTSD symptom clusters), treatment approaches (e.g., therapeutic orientations in psychotherapy and alternative therapies and classifications of drugs in pharmacotherapy), and treatment characteristics (e.g., length of intervention) on treatment outcomes.
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis will provide the current state of evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of various treatment approaches in military-related PTSD while identifying factors that may influence treatment outcomes. Results will inform clinical decision-making for service providers and service users. Finally, findings will provide insights for future treatment development and practice recommendations to better support the well-being of military and Veteran populations.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.