Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Aug 24, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Medical Students’ Perceptions of a Blockchain-Based Decentralized Work History and Credentials Portfolio: Qualitative Feasibility Study

Hasselgren A, Kralevska K, Gligoroski D, Faxvaag A

Medical Students’ Perceptions of a Blockchain-Based Decentralized Work History and Credentials Portfolio: Qualitative Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(10):e33113

DOI: 10.2196/33113

PMID: 34677137

PMCID: 8571681

Medical students’ perceptions of a blockchain-based, decentralized work-history and credentials portfolio: A feasibility study

  • Anton Hasselgren; 
  • Katina Kralevska; 
  • Danilo Gligoroski; 
  • Arild Faxvaag

ABSTRACT

Background:

Increased digitization of healthcare might challenge some of the trust functions that are established in a traditional healthcare system. We have with the concept of VerfiyMed developed a decentralized service for work-history and competence verification, as means to increase trust in the virtual interaction between a patient and caregiver, mitigate administrative burden, and providing patient-reported outcome seamlessly for health professionals. This research aims to validate this usecase of this service in Norway. Secondly, we aim to evaluate the proof-of-concept of VerifyMed, a blockchain-based credential service for healthcare professionals.

Objective:

This research aims to validate the use-case of a decentralized credentials service for healthcare professionals in Norway. Secondly, we aim to evaluate the proof-of-concept of VerifyMed, a blockchain-based credential service for healthcare professionals.

Methods:

A qualitative approach was applied with data collection through nine semi-structured interviews and two focus groups with four and five participants respectively. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was used as a part of the interviews. Data were analyzed through the principles of systematic text condensation. The recruitment of participants ended when it was concluded that the data had reached saturation.

Results:

Five themes were identified from the interviews and the focus groups; (1) The need for aggregated storage of work- and study-related verification, (2) Trust in a virtual healthcare environment, (3) The potential use of patient feedback, (4) Trust in blockchain technology and (5) Improvements of the VerifyMed concept. The SUS questionnaire gave a score of 69,7.

Conclusions:

This study has validated the need for a decentralized system where healthcare professionals can control their credentials and, potentially, their reputation. Future work should update the VerifyMed system according to this input. Conclusion: We concluded that a decentralized system for the storage of work-related, verifiable credentials could increase trust in a virtualized healthcare system.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hasselgren A, Kralevska K, Gligoroski D, Faxvaag A

Medical Students’ Perceptions of a Blockchain-Based Decentralized Work History and Credentials Portfolio: Qualitative Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(10):e33113

DOI: 10.2196/33113

PMID: 34677137

PMCID: 8571681

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.