Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Aug 23, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 28, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Trends in Remote Health Care Consumption in Sweden: Comparison Before and During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Milos Nymberg V, Ellegård LM, Kjellsson G, Wolff M, Borgström Bolmsjö B, Wallman T, Calling S

Trends in Remote Health Care Consumption in Sweden: Comparison Before and During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e33034

DOI: 10.2196/33034

PMID: 34846304

PMCID: 8812677

Trends in remote health care consumption in Sweden: A comparison before and during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic

  • Veronica Milos Nymberg; 
  • Lina Maria Ellegård; 
  • Gustav Kjellsson; 
  • Moa Wolff; 
  • Beata Borgström Bolmsjö; 
  • Thorne Wallman; 
  • Susanna Calling

ABSTRACT

Background:

Remote assessment of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) has been a controversial topic during the fast development of private telemedicine providers in Swedish primary health care. The possibility to unburden the traditional care has been put against a questionable quality of care as well as risks of increased utilization and costs. The covid-19 pandemic has contributed to a changed management of patient care to decrease viral spread, with an expected shift in contact types from in-person to remote ones.

Objective:

The main aim of the present study was to compare health care consumption and type of contacts (in-person or remote) for RTIs before and during the covid-19 pandemic. The second aim was to study whether the number of follow-up contacts after an index contact for RTIs changed during the study period, and whether the number of follow-up contacts differed if the index contact was in-person or remote. A third aim was to study whether the pattern of follow-up contacts differed depending on whether the index contact was with a traditional or a private telemedicine provider.

Methods:

The study design was an observational retrospective analysis with a description of all index contacts and follow-up contacts with physicians in primary care and emergency rooms in a Swedish region (Skåne) for RTIs in patients of all ages and comparison for the same periods in 2018, 2019, and 2020.

Results:

Compared to 2018 and 2019, there were fewer index contacts for RTIs and a higher number of follow-up contacts in 2020, both per 1000 inhabitants and per index contact. The composition of both index and follow-up contacts changed as the share of remote contacts, in particular for traditional care providers, increased.

Conclusions:

During the covid-19 pandemic in 2020, fewer index contacts for RTIs but more follow-up contacts were conducted, compared to 2018-2019. The share of both index and follow-up contacts that were conducted remotely increased. Further studies are needed to study the reasons behind the increase in remote contacts, and if it will last after the pandemic, and more clinical guidelines for remote assessments of RTI are warranted.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Milos Nymberg V, Ellegård LM, Kjellsson G, Wolff M, Borgström Bolmsjö B, Wallman T, Calling S

Trends in Remote Health Care Consumption in Sweden: Comparison Before and During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e33034

DOI: 10.2196/33034

PMID: 34846304

PMCID: 8812677

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.