Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 19, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 11, 2021 - Aug 25, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 9, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Self-Collected, Ambient Temperature–Preserved Nasal Swabs Compared to Samples Collected by Trained Staff for Genotyping of Respiratory Viruses by Shotgun RNA Sequencing: Comparative Study

Soto RA, Paul L, Porucznik CA, Xie H, Stinnett RC, Briggs B, Biggerstaff M, Stanford JB, Schlaberg R

Effectiveness of Self-Collected, Ambient Temperature–Preserved Nasal Swabs Compared to Samples Collected by Trained Staff for Genotyping of Respiratory Viruses by Shotgun RNA Sequencing: Comparative Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e32848

DOI: 10.2196/32848

PMID: 37999952

PMCID: 10709791

A comparative effectiveness of self-collected, ambient temperature-preserved nasal swabs with sample collection by trained staff for genotyping of respiratory viruses by shotgun RNA sequencing

  • Raymond A Soto; 
  • Litty Paul; 
  • Christina A Porucznik; 
  • Heng Xie; 
  • Rita C Stinnett; 
  • Ben Briggs; 
  • Matthew Biggerstaff; 
  • Joseph B Stanford; 
  • Robert Schlaberg

ABSTRACT

Background:

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has underscored the need for field specimen collection and transport to diagnostic and public health laboratories.

Objective:

Self-collected nasal swabs transported without dependency on a cold chain have the potential to remove critical barriers to testing and expand testing capacity and, to reduce opportunities for exposure of health professionals in the context of a pandemic.

Methods:

We compared nasal swab collection by study participants from themselves and their children at home to collection by trained research staff. Swabs were placed in temperature-stable preservative and respiratory viruses were detected by shotgun RNA sequencing, enabling viral genome analysis.

Results:

Study participants reported that self-collection was acceptable. Agreement between identified respiratory viruses in both swabs by sequencing demonstrated adequate collection technique was achieved by brief instructions.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrate the feasibility of scalable and convenient means for identification of respiratory viruses and implementation in pandemic preparedness for influenza virus and other respiratory pathogens.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Soto RA, Paul L, Porucznik CA, Xie H, Stinnett RC, Briggs B, Biggerstaff M, Stanford JB, Schlaberg R

Effectiveness of Self-Collected, Ambient Temperature–Preserved Nasal Swabs Compared to Samples Collected by Trained Staff for Genotyping of Respiratory Viruses by Shotgun RNA Sequencing: Comparative Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e32848

DOI: 10.2196/32848

PMID: 37999952

PMCID: 10709791

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.