Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jul 22, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 31, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

User Perceptions and Use of an Enhanced Electronic Health Record in Rwanda With and Without Clinical Alerts: Cross-sectional Survey

Fraser HS, Mugisha M, Remera E, Ngenzi J, Richards J, Santas X, Naidoo W, Seebregts C, Condo J, Umubyeyi A

User Perceptions and Use of an Enhanced Electronic Health Record in Rwanda With and Without Clinical Alerts: Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(5):e32305

DOI: 10.2196/32305

PMID: 35503526

PMCID: 9115652

User Perceptions and Use of an Enhanced EHR with and without Clinical Alerts, in 54 Health Centers In Rwanda: Cross sectional survey

  • Hamish Scott Fraser; 
  • Michael Mugisha; 
  • Eric Remera; 
  • Joseph Ngenzi; 
  • Janise Richards; 
  • Xenophon Santas; 
  • Wayne Naidoo; 
  • Christopher Seebregts; 
  • Jeanine Condo; 
  • Aline Umubyeyi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health records (EHRs) have been implemented in many low resource settings but lack strong evidence for usability, use, user confidence, scalability and sustainability

Objective:

To evaluate staff use and perceptions of an EHR widely used for HIV care in more than 300 health facilities in Rwanda, providing evidence on factors influencing current performance, scalability, and sustainability.

Methods:

Methods:

A randomized, cross-sectional, structured interview survey of health center staff was designed to assess functionality, usage and attitudes towards the EHR and clinical alerts. The study used the associated randomized clinical trial study sample (56/112 sites received an enhanced EHR) pulling 27 sites from each group. Free text comments were analyzed thematically with inductive coding.

Results:

Ninety staff (90% response rate) were interviewed at 54 health centers: 49% were clinical, 51% technical. The EHR top uses were to access client data easily and/or quickly (68%); update patient records (67%); create new patient records (55%); generate various reports (49%); and review previous records (48%). Greater than 90% agreed the EHR made it easier to make informed decisions, was worth using, and has improved patient information quality. For availability, 75% said they could always or almost always count on the EHR being available, whereas 7% said never/almost never. In intervention sites, staff were significantly more likely to update existing records (P=0.043), generate summaries before (P<0.001), or during visits (P=0.014), and to agree “the EHR provides useful alerts, and reminders” (P< 0.014).

Conclusions:

Most users perceived the EHR as well accepted, appropriate and effective for use in low resource settings despite infrastructure limitation in 25% of sites. Implementation of EHR enhancements can improve perceived usefulness and use of key functions. Successful scale up and use of EHRs in small health facilities could improve clinical documentation, care, reporting, and disease surveillance in low- and middle-income countries.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fraser HS, Mugisha M, Remera E, Ngenzi J, Richards J, Santas X, Naidoo W, Seebregts C, Condo J, Umubyeyi A

User Perceptions and Use of an Enhanced Electronic Health Record in Rwanda With and Without Clinical Alerts: Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(5):e32305

DOI: 10.2196/32305

PMID: 35503526

PMCID: 9115652

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.