Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Jul 21, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults

Young WJ, Bover Manderski M, Ganz O, Delnevo CD, Hrywna M

Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(12):e32294

DOI: 10.2196/32294

PMID: 34898444

PMCID: 8713107

Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment among Young Adults

  • William J Young; 
  • Michelle Bover Manderski; 
  • Ollie Ganz; 
  • Cristine D Delnevo; 
  • Mary Hrywna

ABSTRACT

Background:

Compared to heterosexuals, sexual minorities in the United States experience a higher incidence of negative physical and mental health outcomes. However, a variety of measurement challenges limit researchers’ ability to conduct meaningful survey research to understand these disparities. Many national health surveys only offer respondents three substantive options for reporting their sexual identities (straight/heterosexual, gay or lesbian, and bisexual) despite the prevalence of additional identities, which could lead to measurement error via misreporting and item non-response.

Objective:

This study compared the traditional three-option approach to measuring sexual identity with an expanded approach that offered respondents five additional options.

Methods:

An online survey experiment conducted among New Jersey residents between March and June 2021 randomly assigned 1,258 young adults (ages 18-21) to answer either the three-response measure of sexual identity or the expanded item. Response distributions for each measure were compared as were the odds of item non-response.

Results:

The expanded version of the question appeared to result in more accurate reporting among some subgroups and induced less item non-response. Twelve percent of participants answering the expanded version of the question selected a response that was not available in the shorter version. Females answering the expanded item were less likely to identify as gay or lesbian (2% vs.7%). Females and Non-Hispanic whites were slightly more likely to skip the shorter item (1% vs. 0%). Five percent of respondents answering the longer item were unsure of their sexual identity (a similar option was not available in the shorter version). Compared to respondents answering the longer version of the question, those answering the shorter version had substantially greater odds of skipping the question altogether (Odds Ratio 9.57, 95% CI 1.21-75.73, P=.03).

Conclusions:

Results favor the use of a longer, more detailed approach to measuring sexual identity in epidemiological research. Such a measure will likely allow researchers to produce more accurate estimates of health behaviors and outcomes among sexual minorities.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Young WJ, Bover Manderski M, Ganz O, Delnevo CD, Hrywna M

Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(12):e32294

DOI: 10.2196/32294

PMID: 34898444

PMCID: 8713107

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.