Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 22, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 22, 2021 - Sep 16, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 27, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automated Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment Using the Wells Criteria: Validation Study

Zhang N, Rameau P, Julemis M, Liu Y, Solomon J, Khan S, McGinn T, Richardson S

Automated Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment Using the Wells Criteria: Validation Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e32230

DOI: 10.2196/32230

PMID: 35225812

PMCID: 8922138

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Validation of an Automated Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment Using Well’s Criteria

  • Nasen Zhang; 
  • Philippe Rameau; 
  • Marsophia Julemis; 
  • Yan Liu; 
  • Jeffrey Solomon; 
  • Sundas Khan; 
  • Thomas McGinn; 
  • Safiya Richardson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is frequently used in the emergency department (ED) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), while posing risk for contrast-induced nephropathy and radiation-induced malignancy.

Objective:

We aimed to create an automated process to calculate the Well’s Score for Pulmonary Embolism for patients in the ED, which could potentially reduce unnecessary CTPA studies.

Methods:

We designed an automated process using electronic health records (EHR) data elements, including using a combinatorial keyword search method to query free-text fields, and calculated automated Well’s Scores for a sample of all adult ED encounters that resulted in a CTPA study for PE at two tertiary care hospitals in New York over a two-month period. To validate the automated process, scores were compared to those derived from a two-clinician chart review.

Results:

A total of 202 ED encounters resulted in a completed CTPA to form the retrospective study cohort. Patients classified as “PE likely” by the automated process had a PE prevalence of 15.9%, whereas those classified as “PE unlikely” (Wells’ Score 4) had a PE prevalence of 7.9%. With respect to classification of the patient as “PE likely,” the automated process achieved an accuracy of 92.1% when compared chart review, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93%, 90.5%, 94.4%, and 88.2% respectively.

Conclusions:

This was a successful development and validation of an automated process using EHR data elements, including free-text fields, to classify risk for PE in ED visits.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhang N, Rameau P, Julemis M, Liu Y, Solomon J, Khan S, McGinn T, Richardson S

Automated Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment Using the Wells Criteria: Validation Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e32230

DOI: 10.2196/32230

PMID: 35225812

PMCID: 8922138

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.