Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 15, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 15, 2021 - Sep 9, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 7, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Increasing Effectiveness of a Physical Activity Smartphone Intervention With Positive Suggestions: Randomized Controlled Trial.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Electronic Health (eHealth) interventions have a potential to increase physical activity of their users. However, their effectiveness varies and they often have only short-lasting effects. One possible way to enhance their effectiveness, is increasing positive outcome expectations of the users by giving them positive suggestions regarding the effectiveness of the intervention. It has been shown that when individuals have positive expectations regarding various types of interventions, they tend to benefit from these interventions more.
Objective:
The main objective of this web-based study was to investigate whether positive suggestions can change the expectations of the participants regarding the effectiveness of a smartphone physical activity intervention and subsequently enhance the number of steps participants take during the intervention. Additionally, we studied if suggestions affect perceived app effectiveness, engagement with the app, self-reported vitality and fatigue of the participants.
Methods:
A 21-day physical fully automated activity intervention aimed at helping participants to walk more steps. The intervention was delivered via a smartphone-based application (app), that deliver specific tasks to participants (e.g., setting activity goals or looking for social support) and recorded daily step count of the participants. Participants were randomized to either a positive suggestions group (n = 69) or a control group (n = 64). Positive suggestions emphasizing the effectiveness of the intervention were implemented in an online flyer sent to the participants before the intervention. Suggestions were repeated on day 8 and 15 of the intervention via the app.
Results:
Participants significantly increased their daily step count from baseline compared to 21 days of the intervention (t (107) = -8.62, p < .001) regardless of the suggestions. Participants in the positive suggestions group had more positive expectations regarding the app (B= -1.61, SE= 0.47, p < 0.001) and higher expected engagement with the app (B= 3.80, SE= 0.63, p < .001) compared to the participants in the control group. No effect of suggestions on the step count (B = -22.05, SE = 334.90, p = .95), perceived effectiveness of the app (B= 0.78, SE= 0.69, p= 0.26), engagement with the app (B= 0.78, SE= 0.75, p= 0.29), and vitality (B= 0.01, SE= 0.11, p= 0.95) were found. Positive suggestions decreased the fatigue of participants during the three weeks of the intervention (B= 0.11, SE= 0.02, p< 0.001).
Conclusions:
Even though the suggestions did not affect the number of daily steps, they increased the positive expectations of the participants and decreased their fatigue. These results indicate that adding positive suggestions to eHealth physical activity interventions might be a promising way to influence subjective, but not objective, outcomes of interventions. Future research should focus on finding ways to strengthen the suggestions as they have a potential to boost effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Clinical Trial: osf.io/cwjes
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.