Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 13, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 22, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Fertility Workup With Video Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Quantitative and Qualitative Study

Grens H, de Bruin JP, Huppelschoten A, Kremer J

Fertility Workup With Video Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Quantitative and Qualitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e32000

DOI: 10.2196/32000

PMID: 34936981

PMCID: 8823611

A fertility workup with video consultation: a pilot study with patient experiences in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Hilde Grens; 
  • Jan Peter de Bruin; 
  • Aleida Huppelschoten; 
  • Jan Kremer

ABSTRACT

Background:

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the mayor part of elective healthcare in the Netherlands, such as reproductive medicine, was paused. When healthcare was resumed, video consultations were used as a new solution to continue consultations within the new governmental rules of social distancing. Prior to this COVID-19 situation, video consulting was not used intensively in the Netherlands, therefore physicians and patients were not familiar with this way of consultation.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to measure the level of patient-centeredness and shared decision making in infertile couples, who undergo a fertility workup per video consultation.

Methods:

This is a questionnaire study with an additional qualitative part for more in depth understanding. Infertile couples, i.e. men and women after one year of unprotected intercourse, were referred to a fertility centre and underwent a fertility workup per video consult. The fertility workup consisted of two separate video consultations, with diagnostic tests according to protocol. After the last video consultation couples received a digital questionnaire, which consisted of a modified version of the PCQ-Infertility and the CollaboRATE questionnaire. Fifty-three eligible infertile couples were approached of which twenty-two participated. Four women were approached for a semi-structured interview.

Results:

The median score on the modified PCQ-Infertility was 2.64, on a scale of 0 to 3. The highest rating was on the subscale ‘Communication and Information’ and the lowest rating was for the subscale ‘Organization of care’. The median score on the CollaboRATE questionnaire was 8 on a scale of 1 to 9, on all three sub-questions. Patients mentioned privacy, less travel time and easy use of the program as possible benefits of the video consultation. However, patients preferred the first consultation with their physician to face-to-face as video consultation was experienced less personal.

Conclusions:

The high level of patient-centeredness and shared decision making, show that video consultation is a promising way of providing care remotely, although attention has te be payed to mitigate the more impersonal setting than face-to-face consultation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Grens H, de Bruin JP, Huppelschoten A, Kremer J

Fertility Workup With Video Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Quantitative and Qualitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e32000

DOI: 10.2196/32000

PMID: 34936981

PMCID: 8823611

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.