Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 28, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 1, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Pediatric Weight Management Through mHealth Compared to Face-to-Face Care: Cost Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial

Tully L, Sorensen J, O'Malley G

Pediatric Weight Management Through mHealth Compared to Face-to-Face Care: Cost Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(9):e31621

DOI: 10.2196/31621

PMID: 34519665

PMCID: 8479601

Comparing the costs of paediatric weight management through mHealth to face-to-face care

  • Louise Tully; 
  • Jan Sorensen; 
  • Grace O'Malley

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mobile health (mHealth) may improve paediatric weight management capacity, geographical reach for services, and overcome barriers to attending physical appointments by utilising ubiquitous devices such as smartphones and tablets, but the field remains an emerging research area with some evidence for effectiveness but no literature describing economic evaluations.

Objective:

We aimed to assess the economic viability of delivering a mHealth approach as an alternative to standard multidisciplinary care, by assessing the direct costs incurred within treatment arms during a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods:

A digitally delivered (via smartphone app) maintenance phase of a paediatric weight management programme was developed iteratively with patients and families using evidence-based approaches. We undertook a micro-costing exercise and budget impact analysis to assess the costs of delivery from the perspective of the publicly funded healthcare system. Resource use was captured alongside a RCT, and we used a micro-costing approach to estimate costs associated with staff time and resources for service delivery per participant.

Results:

We estimated the mean direct cost per adolescent attending usual care at €142 (SD 23.7) while the cost per adolescent in the mHealth group was €722 (SD 221.1), with variation depending on the number of weeks of treatment completed. The budget impact for offering this approach to all newly referred patients in a one year period was estimated at €59,046 using the delivery approach assessed. The main driver of costs in the mHealth arm the need for health professional monitoring and support for patients on a weekly basis.

Conclusions:

This mHealth approach was more costly than usual care, although modifications to the intervention may offer opportunities to reduce the mHealth costs. The need for monitoring and support from healthcare professionals was not eliminated using this model of delivery. Further research is needed to explore the cost-effectiveness and economic impact on families and from a wider societal perspective. Clinical Trial: NCT01804855


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tully L, Sorensen J, O'Malley G

Pediatric Weight Management Through mHealth Compared to Face-to-Face Care: Cost Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(9):e31621

DOI: 10.2196/31621

PMID: 34519665

PMCID: 8479601

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.