Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 15, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 15, 2021 - Aug 10, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 7, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Development of the Socioeconomic Screening, Active Engagement, Follow-up, Education, Discharge Readiness, and Consistency (SAFEDC) Model for Improving Transitions of Care: Participatory Design

Shin JY, Okammor N, Hendee K, Pawlikowski A, Jenq G, Bozaan DA

Development of the Socioeconomic Screening, Active Engagement, Follow-up, Education, Discharge Readiness, and Consistency (SAFEDC) Model for Improving Transitions of Care: Participatory Design

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e31277

DOI: 10.2196/31277

PMID: 35412461

PMCID: 9044161

The SAFEDC Model for Improving Transitions of Care: Lessons Learned from a Participatory Design Workshop

  • Ji Youn Shin; 
  • Nkiru Okammor; 
  • Karly Hendee; 
  • Amber Pawlikowski; 
  • Grace Jenq; 
  • David Andrew Bozaan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Transition home after hospitalization involves the potential risk of adverse patient events, such as knowledge deficits related to self-care, medication errors, and readmissions. Despite broad organizational efforts to provide better care transitions for patients, there are challenges in implementing interventions that effectively improve care transition outcomes, as evidenced by readmission rates. Collaborative efforts that require healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers to work together are necessary to identify gaps associated with transitions of care and generate effective transitional care interventions.

Objective:

This study aims to understand the effectiveness of the Integrated Michigan Patient-Centered Alliance in Care Transitions (I-MPACT) design model of bringing together stakeholders of the healthcare system and providing them with a novel tool that captures the patient perspective (patient journey map).

Methods:

We chose a mixed method of direct patient observations and a participatory design workshop to develop transitional care interventions that serve each hospital’s unique situation and contexts. By applying thematic analysis methods, we analyzed problem statements and proposed interventions collected from the participatory design workshops. Findings showed the patterns of major discussion during the workshop.

Results:

Based on workshop results, we formalized the I-MPACT transition of care model, SAFEDC (socioeconomic, active engagement, follow-up, education, discharge readiness tool, consistency), which other organizations can apply to improve patient experiences in care transition.

Conclusions:

Our study demonstrates the benefits of the participatory design approach in defining challenges associated with transitions of care related to patient discharge and generating sustainable interventions to improve care transitions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shin JY, Okammor N, Hendee K, Pawlikowski A, Jenq G, Bozaan DA

Development of the Socioeconomic Screening, Active Engagement, Follow-up, Education, Discharge Readiness, and Consistency (SAFEDC) Model for Improving Transitions of Care: Participatory Design

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e31277

DOI: 10.2196/31277

PMID: 35412461

PMCID: 9044161

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.