Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: May 27, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: May 27, 2021 - Jul 22, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 24, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mapping Individual Differences on the Internet: Case Study of the Type 1 Diabetes Community

Bedford-Petersen C, Weston SJ

Mapping Individual Differences on the Internet: Case Study of the Type 1 Diabetes Community

JMIR Diabetes 2021;6(4):e30756

DOI: 10.2196/30756

PMID: 34652277

PMCID: 8556640

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Mapping Individual Differences Online: A Case Study of the Type 1 Diabetes Community

  • Cianna Bedford-Petersen; 
  • Sara J Weston

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social media platforms, such as Twitter, are increasingly popular among communities of people with chronic conditions, including people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Objective:

The current study attempts to document the major themes of Twitter posts using a natural language processes method to identify topics of interest in the T1D online community.

Methods:

Through Twitter scraping, we gathered a dataset of 691,691 Tweets from 8,557 accounts which represent people with T1D, their caregivers, health practitioners, and advocates. Tweet content was analyzed for sentiment and topic using Latent Dirichlet allocation. We used social network analysis to examine the degree to which identified topics are siloed within specific groups or disseminated through the broader T1D online community.

Results:

Tweets were, on average, positive in sentiment. Through topic modeling, we identified six broad bandwidth topics, ranging from clinical to advocacy to daily management to emotional health, which can inform researchers and practitioners interested in the needs of people with T1D. Moreover, social network analysis suggests that users are likely to see a mix of these topics discussed by accounts they follow.

Conclusions:

Twitter online communities are sources of information for people with T1D and members related to that community. Topics identified reveal key concerns of the T1D community and may be useful to practitioners and researchers alike. The methods used are efficient (low cost) while providing researchers with enormous amounts of data. We provide code to facilitate the use of these methods with other populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bedford-Petersen C, Weston SJ

Mapping Individual Differences on the Internet: Case Study of the Type 1 Diabetes Community

JMIR Diabetes 2021;6(4):e30756

DOI: 10.2196/30756

PMID: 34652277

PMCID: 8556640

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.