Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: May 3, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 11, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Human-centered design and usability evaluation of LOOP, a patient outcomes-driven feedback platform for emergency medicine clinicians
ABSTRACT
Background:
The availability of patient outcomes-based feedback is limited in episodic care environments like the emergency department (ED). Emergency medicine (EM) clinicians set care trajectories for a majority of hospitalized patients and provide definitive care to an even larger number of those discharged into the community. EM clinicians are often unaware of short- and long-term health outcomes of patients and how their actions may have contributed. Despite large volumes of patients and data, outcomes-driven learning that targets individual clinician experiences is meager. Integrated electronic health record (EHR) systems provide opportunity, but do not have readily available functionality intended for outcomes-based learning.
Objective:
This study sought to unlock insights from routinely collected EHR data through the development of an individualizable patient outcomes feedback platform for EM clinicians. Here, we describe the iterative development of this platform, Linking Outcomes of Patients (LOOP), under a human-centered design (HCD) framework, including structured feedback obtained from its use.
Methods:
This multi-modal study consisting of human-centered design studios, surveys (24 physicians), interviews (11 physicians), and a LOOP application usability evaluation (12 EM physicians for > 30 min each) was performed between August 2019 and February 2021. The study spanned 3 phases: (1) conceptual development under a human-centered design framework, (2) LOOP technical platform development, and (3) usability evaluation comparing pre- and post-LOOP feedback gathering practices in the EHR.
Results:
An initial HCD studio and EM clinician surveys revealed common themes of disconnect between EM clinicians and their patients post-encounter. Fundamental post-encounter outcomes of death (63% respondents identified as useful), escalation of care (83%), and return to ED (67%) were determined high yield for demonstrating proof-of-concept in our LOOP application. The studio aided the design and development of LOOP, which integrated physicians throughout the design and content iteration. A final LOOP prototype enabled usability evaluation and iterative refinement prior to launch. Usability evaluation compared to status quo (i.e., pre-LOOP) feedback gathering practices demonstrated a shift – across all outcomes – from ‘not easy’ to ‘very easy’ to obtain and from ‘not confident’ to ‘very confident’ in estimating outcomes after using LOOP. On a scale from 0 (unlikely) to 10 (most likely), the users were very likely (9.5) to recommend LOOP to a colleague.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates the potential for human-centered design of a patient-outcomes driven feedback platform for individual EM providers. We have outlined a framework for working along-side clinicians with a multi-disciplined team to develop and test a tool that augments their clinical experience and enables closed-loop learning.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.