Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Apr 30, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 26, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Usability of Wearable Multiparameter Technology to Continuously Monitor Free-Living Vital Signs in People Living With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prospective Observational Study

France G, Greening N, Esliger D, Briggs-Price S, Richardson M, Chaplin E, Clinch L, Steiner M, Singh S, Orme M

Usability of Wearable Multiparameter Technology to Continuously Monitor Free-Living Vital Signs in People Living With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prospective Observational Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e30091

DOI: 10.2196/30091

PMID: 35171101

PMCID: 8892301

Usability of wearable multiparameter technology to continuously monitor free-living vital signs in people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Prospective Observational Study

  • Grace France; 
  • Neil Greening; 
  • Dale Esliger; 
  • Samuel Briggs-Price; 
  • Matthew Richardson; 
  • Emma Chaplin; 
  • Lisa Clinch; 
  • Michael Steiner; 
  • Sally Singh; 
  • Mark Orme

ABSTRACT

Background:

Vital signs monitoring (VSM) is routine for inpatients but monitoring during free-living conditions is largely untested in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Objective:

This study investigated the usability and acceptability of continuous VSM for people with COPD using wearable multiparameter technology.

Methods:

50 people following hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and 50 people with stable COPD symptoms were asked to wear an Equivital Lifemonitor during waking hours for 6 weeks. The device recorded heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), skin temperature and physical activity. Number of days the vest was worn, daily wear time, signal quality and data quality were examined. Participant feedback was assessed during follow-up phone calls.

Results:

84% of participants provided data, with average daily wear time of 11.8±2.2 hours for 32±11 days. There was greater adherence in the stable group compared to the post-AECOPD group (≥5 weeks wear: 71.4% vs 45.7%, P=.024). Stable group BMI was associated with HR signal quality (rs=0.45, P=.008) and HR data quality (rs=0.44, P=.008). For AECOPD group, RR data quality was associated with waist circumference and BMI (rs=-0.49, P=.009, and rs=-0.44, P=.016). Overall participants accepted the technology, but some expressed concerns with wearing a device around their chest.

Conclusions:

This wearable multiparametric technology showed good user acceptance and was able to measure vital signs in a COPD population. Data quality was generally high but was influenced by body composition. Overall, it was feasible to continuously measure vital signs during free-living conditions in people with COPD symptoms but with additional challenges in the post-AECOPD context. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN registry; No. ISRCTN12855961.


 Citation

Please cite as:

France G, Greening N, Esliger D, Briggs-Price S, Richardson M, Chaplin E, Clinch L, Steiner M, Singh S, Orme M

Usability of Wearable Multiparameter Technology to Continuously Monitor Free-Living Vital Signs in People Living With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prospective Observational Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e30091

DOI: 10.2196/30091

PMID: 35171101

PMCID: 8892301

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.