Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Apr 15, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 10, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 23, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Effectiveness and feasibility of internet-based interventions for grief after bereavement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT
Objective:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and feasibility of internet- and mobile-based interventions against symptoms of grief after bereavement.
Methods:
Systematic literature searches of randomized controlled trials or feasibility studies published before 9th of January 2020 following the PRISMA-guidelines were conducted in PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Library. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system; we further assessed aspects of feasibility and rated quality of interventions using criteria suggested by an expert panel on mental health care (German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics; DGPPN). Random effects meta-analysis was conducted, assessing between-group effect sizes.
Results:
Nine trials were included, comprising a total of 1.349 individuals. Of these, seven studies were analyzed meta-analytically. Significant effects were found for symptoms of grief (g = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.32.; 0.77), depression (g = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.20; 0.68) and posttraumatic stress (g = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.63; 1.01). Heterogeneity was moderate for grief and depression (I² = 48.75% and 55.19%, respectively) and low for posttraumatic stress symptoms (I²=0.00%). Overall-quality of evidence was graded low (grief, depression) to moderate (posttraumatic stress). User satisfaction with interventions was high, as was quality of interventions assessed using objective quality criteria.
Conclusions:
Internet- or mobile-based interventions might constitute an effective treatment approach against symptoms of grief in bereaved adults. However, small sample sizes and limited numbers of studies included in the review warrant further investigations. Registration: The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42012002100).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.