Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Apr 8, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 27, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Applicant Perceptions of the Impact of Social Media on the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle Occurring During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study

Naaseh A, Thompson S, Tohmasi S, Wiechmann W, Toohey S, Wray A, Boysen Osborn M

Evaluating Applicant Perceptions of the Impact of Social Media on the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle Occurring During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(4):e29486

DOI: 10.2196/29486

PMID: 34591779

PMCID: 8527380

Evaluating Applicant Perceptions of the Impact of Social Media on the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle Occurring During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey

  • Ariana Naaseh; 
  • Sean Thompson; 
  • Steven Tohmasi; 
  • Warren Wiechmann; 
  • Shannon Toohey; 
  • Alisa Wray; 
  • Megan Boysen Osborn

ABSTRACT

Background:

Due to challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, residency programs in the United States of America conducted virtual interviews during the 2020-2021 application season. As a result, programs and applicants may have relied more heavily on social media-based communication and dissemination of information.

Objective:

We sought to determine social media’s impact on residency applicants during an entirely virtual application cycle.

Methods:

An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed to 465 eligible 2021 Match applicants at four University of California Schools of Medicine in the USA.

Results:

Seventy-two participants (15.5% of eligible respondents), applying to 16 specialties, responded. Of those who responded 53.5% (n = 38) reported following prospective residency accounts on social media, and of those 89.5% (n = 34) were positively or negatively influenced by these accounts. The top three digital methods by which applicants sought information about residency programs included the program website, digital conversations with residents and fellows of that program, and Instagram. Fifty-three percent (n = 38) respondents attended prospective program virtual information sessions. A minority of applicants (26%, n = 19) adjusted the number of programs applied to based on information found on social media, with most (74%, n = 14) increasing the number of programs to which they applied. Survey respondents ranked social media’s effectiveness in allowing applicants to learn about programs at 6.7 (SD +/- 2.1) on a visual analogue scale. Most applicants (86%, n = 61) felt that programs should utilize social media in future application cycles even if non-virtual.

Conclusions:

Social media appears to be an important tool for resident recruitment. Future studies should seek more information on its effect on later parts of the application cycle and the Match.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Naaseh A, Thompson S, Tohmasi S, Wiechmann W, Toohey S, Wray A, Boysen Osborn M

Evaluating Applicant Perceptions of the Impact of Social Media on the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle Occurring During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(4):e29486

DOI: 10.2196/29486

PMID: 34591779

PMCID: 8527380

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.