Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 8, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Real-time Symptom Assessment in Patients With Endometriosis: Psychometric Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, Based on the Experience Sampling Method

van Barneveld E

Real-time Symptom Assessment in Patients With Endometriosis: Psychometric Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, Based on the Experience Sampling Method

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e29480

DOI: 10.2196/29480

PMID: 36867439

PMCID: 10024211

Real-time symptom assessment in patients with endometriosis: Psychometric evaluation of an electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measure, based on the Experience Sampling Method.

  • Esther van Barneveld

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Experience Sampling Method (ESM) holds advantages over traditional retrospective questionnaires including a high ecological validity, no recall bias, the ability to assess fluctuation of symptoms and the ability to analyse the temporal relationship between variables.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of an endometriosis-specific ESM tool.

Methods:

This is a short-term follow-up prospective study, including premenopausal endometriosis patients aged ≥18 years that reported dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain or dyspareunia between December 2019 and November 2020. An ESM-based questionnaire was sent out by a smartphone application ten times a day during one week on randomly chosen moments. Additionally, patients completed questionnaires concerning demographics, end-of-day pain scores, and end-of-week symptom scores. The psychometric evaluation included compliance, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

Results:

Twenty-eight endometriosis patients completed the study. Compliance for answering the ESM questions was as high as 52%. End-of-week pain scores were higher compared to ESM mean scores and showed peak-reporting. ESM scores showed strong concurrent validity when compared to symptoms scored by the GSRS-IBS, GAD-7, PHQ-9 and the majority of questions of the EHP-30. Cronbach’s α coefficients demonstrated a good internal consistency for abdominal symptoms, general somatic symptoms and positive affect and an excellent internal consistency for negative affect. Moreover, excellent test-retest reliability was shown.

Conclusions:

The current study supports the validity and reliability of a newly developed electronic instrument for the measurement of symptoms in women with endometriosis, based on momentary assessments. This ESM-PROM has the advantage of a more detailed view on individual symptom patterns and can offer the possibility of self-insight of patients in their symptomatology, leading to more individualized treatment strategies which can improve the quality of life of women suffering from endometriosis. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van Barneveld E

Real-time Symptom Assessment in Patients With Endometriosis: Psychometric Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, Based on the Experience Sampling Method

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e29480

DOI: 10.2196/29480

PMID: 36867439

PMCID: 10024211

PDF not available

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.