Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Apr 6, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 6, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 27, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 2, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Wiebe D, Nippak P, Meyer J, Remers S

Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(12):e29243

DOI: 10.2196/29243

PMID: 34855615

PMCID: 8686458

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Survey

  • Deanna Wiebe; 
  • Pria Nippak; 
  • Julien Meyer; 
  • Shannon Remers

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) in the treatment of mental health has emerged as a method of improving psychotherapy treatment outcomes. Despite this, very few clinicians regularly use ROM in clinical practice. Online ROM has been suggested as a solution to increase adoption.

Objective:

To identify the influence of moving ROM online on client completion rates of self-reported outcome measures and to identify implementation and utilization barriers to online ROM by assessing clinicians’ views on their experience utilizing the online system over previous paper-based methods.

Methods:

Client completion rates of self-reported outcome measures were compared pre and post implementation of an online system of ROM. In addition, a survey questionnaire was administered to 340 mental health service providers regarding their perception of benefits with an online system of ROM.

Results:

Client completion rates of self-reported measures increased from 15% to 54% after moving online. Fifty-eight% of service providers found the new system less time consuming than previous paper-based ROM and 64% found that it helped monitor clients. However, the perceived value of the system remains in doubt as only 23% found it helped them identify clients at risk for treatment failure, and only 18% found it strengthened the therapeutic alliance.

Conclusions:

Although the current study suggests mixed results regarding service providers’ views on their experience using an online system for ROM, it has identified barriers and challenges that are actionable for improvement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wiebe D, Nippak P, Meyer J, Remers S

Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(12):e29243

DOI: 10.2196/29243

PMID: 34855615

PMCID: 8686458

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.