Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Mar 30, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 8, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Web-Based Discussion and Illicit Street Sales of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Australia: Epidemiological Surveillance Study

Black J, Margolin ZR, Bau G, Olson R, Iwanicki JL, Dart RC

Web-Based Discussion and Illicit Street Sales of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Australia: Epidemiological Surveillance Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(12):e29187

DOI: 10.2196/29187

PMID: 34932012

PMCID: 8726044

Online Discussion and Illicit Street Sales of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Australia: Epidemiological Surveillance Study

  • Joshua Black; 
  • Zachary R Margolin; 
  • Gabrielle Bau; 
  • Richard Olson; 
  • Janetta L Iwanicki; 
  • Richard C Dart

ABSTRACT

Background:

Opioid use disorder and its consequences are a persistent public health concern for Australians. Online activity has been utilized to understand perception of drug safety and diversion of drugs in contexts outside of Australia. The anonymity of the internet offers several advantages to surveilling and inquiring about specific covert behaviors, such as diversion or discussing sensitive subjects, where traditional surveillance approaches might be limited.

Objective:

The goal was to characterize content of online posts and compare reports of illicit sales of tapentadol and oxycodone from sources originating from Australia. First, post content was evaluated to determine if internet discussion encourages or discourages proper therapeutic use of the drugs. Second, we hypothesized that tapentadol would have lower street price and lower number of illicit sales than oxycodone.

Methods:

Web posts originating from Australia between 2017 and 2019 were collected using the Researched Abuse, Diversion and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARSĀ®) System Web Monitoring Program. Post content was categorized into topics of discussion related to harms and behaviors that could lead to harm. Illicit sales data were collected through a crowdsourcing website between 2016 and 2019 using the RADARSĀ® System StreetRx Program. Two multivariable regression models assessed differences in illicit price and number of sales.

Results:

A total of 4.67% of tapentadol posts (N = 600) discussed an adverse event while 10.27% (95% CI: 9.32, 11.21) of oxycodone posts (N = 8,598) discussed this topic. A total of 10.0% of tapentadol posts discussed unsafe use or side effects, while 20.17% (95% CI: 18.92, 21.41) of oxycodone posts discussed unsafe use or side effects. There were 31 illicit sale reports for tapentadol (geometric mean price per milligram: $0.12 Australian dollar (AUD)) and 756 for oxycodone ($1.28 AUD). Models detected no differences in the street price or number of sales between drugs when covariates were included, though potency of the pill significantly predicted the street price (P<0.001) and availability predicted number of sales (P=0.0295).

Conclusions:

Australians searching online for opinions could judge tapentadol as safer than oxycodone due to online post content. The illicit sales market for tapentadol was smaller than oxycodone, and drug potency and licit availability are likely important factors influencing the illicit market.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Black J, Margolin ZR, Bau G, Olson R, Iwanicki JL, Dart RC

Web-Based Discussion and Illicit Street Sales of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Australia: Epidemiological Surveillance Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(12):e29187

DOI: 10.2196/29187

PMID: 34932012

PMCID: 8726044

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.