Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 24, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 1, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Identifying Information Gaps in Electronic Health Records by Using Natural Language Processing: Gynecologic Surgery History Identification

Moon S, Carlson LA, Moser ED, Agnikula Kshatriya BS, Smith CY, Rocca WA, Gazzuola Rocca L, Bielinski SJ, Liu H, Larson NB

Identifying Information Gaps in Electronic Health Records by Using Natural Language Processing: Gynecologic Surgery History Identification

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e29015

DOI: 10.2196/29015

PMID: 35089141

PMCID: 8838563

Identifying Information Gaps in Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Extracting Gynecologic Surgery Status

  • Sungrim Moon; 
  • Luke A Carlson; 
  • Ethan D Moser; 
  • Bhavani Singh Agnikula Kshatriya; 
  • Carin Y Smith; 
  • Walter A Rocca; 
  • Liliana Gazzuola Rocca; 
  • Suzette J Bielinski; 
  • Hongfang Liu; 
  • Nicholas B Larson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health records (EHR) are a rich source of longitudinal patient data. However, missing information due to clinical care that predates the implementation of EHR system(s) or care that occurred at different medical institutions impedes complete ascertainment of a patient’s medical history.

Objective:

This study aimed to quantify information gaps by comparing the gynecological surgical history extracted from an EHR of a single institution using NLP techniques with the manually curated surgical history information through chart review of records from multiple independent regional healthcare institutions.

Methods:

We developed a rule-based NLP algorithm to detect gynecological surgery history from the unstructured narrative of the Mayo Clinic EHR. These results were compared to a gold standard cohort of 3870 women with gynecological surgery status adjudicated using the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records-linkage system. We quantified and characterized the information gaps observed that led to misclassification of surgical status.

Results:

The NLP algorithm achieved 0.76 recall, 0.79 precision, and 0.76 F1-score in the test set (n = 265). We applied the algorithm to the validation set (n = 3340) and identified two types of information gaps through error analysis. First, 6% of women in this study had no recorded surgery information or partial information in the EHR. Second, 4% of women had inconsistent or inaccurate information within the clinical narrative due to misinterpreted information, erroneous “copy and paste,” or incorrect information provided by patients. Additionally, the NLP algorithm misclassified the surgery status of 4% of women.

Conclusions:

NLP techniques were able to adequately recreate the gynecologic surgical status from the clinical narrative. However, missing or inaccurately reported and/or recorded information resulted in much of the misclassification observed. Therefore, alternative approaches to collect or curate surgical history are needed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Moon S, Carlson LA, Moser ED, Agnikula Kshatriya BS, Smith CY, Rocca WA, Gazzuola Rocca L, Bielinski SJ, Liu H, Larson NB

Identifying Information Gaps in Electronic Health Records by Using Natural Language Processing: Gynecologic Surgery History Identification

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e29015

DOI: 10.2196/29015

PMID: 35089141

PMCID: 8838563

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.