Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 29, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mobile Phone Apps for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: Systematic Search on App Stores

Draughon Moret J, Todd A, Rose L, Pollitt E, Anderson J

Mobile Phone Apps for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: Systematic Search on App Stores

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e28959

DOI: 10.2196/28959

PMID: 35133285

PMCID: 8864520

Mobile Phone Applications for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: A Systematic Search on App Stores

  • Jessica Draughon Moret; 
  • Angela Todd; 
  • Lauren Rose; 
  • Erin Pollitt; 
  • Jocelyn Anderson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Since the 2008 advent of the smartphone, more than 180 billion copies of apps have been downloaded from the Apple App Store, with more than 2.6 million apps available for Android, and 2.2 million apps available for iOS. Many violence prevention and response apps have been developed as part of this app proliferation.

Objective:

To evaluate the quality of freely available mobile phone applications targeting intimate partner violence and sexual violence prevention and response.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review of violence prevention and response mobile phone applications freely available in the Apple App Store (iOS) (March 2016) and Google Play (Android) store (July 2016). Search terms included: violence prevention, sexual assault, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, sexual violence, forensic nursing, wife abuse, rape. Apps were included for review if they were: freely available, English language, had a primary purpose related to prevention or response to sexual or intimate partner violence regardless of app target end users.

Results:

Using the Mobile App Rating Scale, we reviewed a total of 132 unique apps. The majority of apps reviewed had a primary purpose of sharing information or resources. Overall the apps reviewed were of low-to-moderate quality with the Overall Subjective Quality mean for the reviewed apps being 2.65 (95% CI 2.58-2.72). Quality scores for each of the five MARS categories ranged from 2.80 (Engagement) to 4.75 (Functionality). An incidental but important finding of our review was the difficulty in searching for apps and the plethora of non-related apps that appear when searching for key words such as “rape” and “domestic violence” that may be harmful to people seeking help.

Conclusions:

While there are a variety of mobile applications available designed to provide information or other services related to sexual and partner violence, they range greatly in quality. They are also challenging to find given the current infrastructure of app store searches, keyword prioritization, and highlighting based on user rating. It is important for providers to be aware of these resources and be knowledgeable on how to review and recommend mobile phone apps to patients when appropriate.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Draughon Moret J, Todd A, Rose L, Pollitt E, Anderson J

Mobile Phone Apps for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: Systematic Search on App Stores

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e28959

DOI: 10.2196/28959

PMID: 35133285

PMCID: 8864520

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.