Explore our sister journals here.

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIRx Med

Date Submitted: Mar 12, 2021
Date Accepted: Mar 12, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”

Mbwogge M

Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”

JMIRx Med 2021;2(2):e28744

DOI: 10.2196/28744

PMCID: 10414480

Author Responses to Peer Review of "Mass Testing with Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the UK: Systematic Review" (ms#27254)

  • Mathew Mbwogge

ABSTRACT

This is author responses to peer review.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mbwogge M

Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”

JMIRx Med 2021;2(2):e28744

DOI: 10.2196/28744

PMCID: 10414480

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.