Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Serious Games
Date Submitted: Mar 22, 2021
Date Accepted: Jun 28, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 12, 2021
The feasibility and effects of virtual-reality motor-cognitive training in community-dwelling older people with cognitive frailty: A pilot randomized controlled trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Cognitive frailty refers to the coexistence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment and is associated with many adverse health outcomes. While cognitive frailty is prevalent in older people, motor-cognitive training is effective at enhancing cognitive and physical function We propose a virtual reality (VR) simultaneous motor-cognitive training program, which allows older people to practice performing daily activities in a virtual space mimicking real environments.
Objective:
We aimed 1) to explore the feasibility of offering VR simultaneous motor-cognitive training to older people with cognitive frailty and 2) to compare its effects with an existing motor-cognitive training program in the community on the cognitive function and physical function of older people with cognitive frailty.
Methods:
A two-arm (1:1), assessor-blinded, parallel design, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was employed. The eligibility criteria for participants were: 1) ageā„60 years, 2) community dwelling, and 3) with cognitive frailty. Those in the intervention group received cognitive training (i.e., cognitive games) and motor training (i.e., cycling on an ergometer) simultaneously on a VR platform, mimicking the daily living activities of older people. Those in the control group received cognitive training (i.e., cognitive games) on tablet computers and motor training (i.e., cycling on the ergometer) sequentially on a non-VR platform. Both groups received a 30-minute session twice a week for 8 weeks. Feasibility was measured by adherence, adverse outcomes, and successful learning. The outcomes were cognitive function, physical frailty level, and walking speed.
Results:
Seventeen participants were recruited and randomized into either the control group (n=8) or intervention group (n=9). At baseline, the median age was 74.0 years (IQR=9.5) and the median MoCA score was 20.0 (IQR=4.0). No significant between-group differences were found except in the number of chronic illnesses (P=0.043). At post-intervention, the intervention group (Z=-2.673, P=0.008) showed a significantly larger improvement in cognitive function than the control group (Z=-1.187, P=0.235). The reduction in physical frailty in the intervention group (Z=-1.730, P=0.084) was similar to that in the control group (Z=-1.890, P=0.059). The TUG-measured improvement in walking speed was moderate in the intervention group (Z=-0.159, P=0.110), and greater in the control group (Z=-2.521, P=0.012). The recruitment rate was acceptable (17/33, 51.5%). Both groups had a 100% attendance rate. The intervention group had a higher completion rate than the control group. Training was terminated for one participant (1/9, 11.1%) due to minimal VR sickness (VRSQ=18.3/100). Two participants (2/8, 25%) in the control group withdrew due to moderate leg pain. No injuries were observed in both groups.
Conclusions:
This study provides preliminary evidence that the VR simultaneous motor-cognitive training group experienced greater improvement in cognitive function than the control group, and reduced frailty and improved walking speed. VR training is feasible and safe for older people with cognitive frailty. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04467216
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.