Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 1, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 26, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review

Woodcock E

Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e28323

DOI: 10.2196/28323

PMID: 35014968

PMCID: 8790681

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Barriers and Facilitators to Automated Patient Self-Scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review

  • Elizabeth Woodcock

ABSTRACT

Background:

Appointment management in the outpatient setting is important for health care organizations as waits and delays lead to poor outcomes. Automated patient self-scheduling of outpatient appointments has demonstrable advantages in the form of patients’ arrival rates, labor savings, patient satisfaction, and more. Despite evidence of the potential benefits of self-scheduling, organizational uptake of self-scheduling in health care has been limited. The goal of this scoping study is to identify the barriers and facilitators to self-scheduling for health care organizations.

Objective:

-

Methods:

A scoping review was conducted by searching four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Business Source Ultimate and Scopus) and systematically reviewing peer-reviewed studies. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework was utilized to catalogue the studies.

Results:

Thirty-one full-text articles were included in the review. Results demonstrated that self-scheduling initiatives have increased over time, indicating the broadening appeal of self-scheduling. The body of literature regarding the intervention characteristics of self-scheduling, including evidence, relative advantage, and adaptability, is appreciable. The influence of national policy was the most-cited external factor, as defined by the CFIR framework. Scholarly pursuit lacked recommendations related to the framework’s inner setting, characteristics of individuals and process. Future discoveries regarding these CFIR domains may help detect, categorize, and appreciate organizational-level barriers and facilitators to self-scheduling to advance knowledge about this solution.

Conclusions:

The scoping review catalogued evidence of the existence, advantages, and intervention characteristics of patient self-scheduling; gaps in knowledge of the uptake of self-scheduling by health care organizations were identified to inform future research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Woodcock E

Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e28323

DOI: 10.2196/28323

PMID: 35014968

PMCID: 8790681

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.