Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 25, 2021
Date Accepted: Apr 3, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patients’ Experiences of a Nurse-Led, Home-Based Heart Failure Self-management Program: Findings From a Qualitative Process Evaluation

Wang W, Jiang Y, Koh KWL, RAMACHANDRAN HJ, Tay YK, Wu VX, Shorey S

Patients’ Experiences of a Nurse-Led, Home-Based Heart Failure Self-management Program: Findings From a Qualitative Process Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e28216

DOI: 10.2196/28216

PMID: 33904823

PMCID: 8114165

Patients’ experiences of a nurse-led home-based heart failure self-management programme: Findings from a qualitative process evaluation

  • Wenru Wang; 
  • Ying Jiang; 
  • Karen Wei Ling Koh; 
  • Hadassah Joann RAMACHANDRAN; 
  • Yee Kian Tay; 
  • Vivien Xi Wu; 
  • Shefaly Shorey

ABSTRACT

Aims: To explore participants’ perspectives on a nurse-led home-based heart failure self-management programme (HOM-HEMP) in a randomized controlled trial conducted in Singapore to gain insight into the effectiveness or failure of the study intervention. Design: A descriptive, qualitative approach was adopted. Method: English or Chinese-speaking participants from the intervention arms were recruited through a purposive sampling method from January 2019 to July 2019. Individual, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants. All the interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, with the identifiers of the participants omitted to ensure confidentiality. The thematic analysis approach was used for identifying, analyzing and reporting the patterns (themes) within the data.

Results:

Six themes emerged from the process evaluation interviews and were categorized according to Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome framework as "intervention structure," "intervention process," and "intervention outcome". These six themes were manageability of intervention, areas for improvement, benefits of visiting, personal accountability in self-care, empowered with knowledge and skills in self-care after the intervention, and increased self-efficacy in cardiac care. Conclusion: The findings of the process evaluation provided additional information about participants' perceptions and experiences with the HOM-HEMP intervention. While home visit may be perceived as resource intensive, it remains the preferred way of engagement for most of the elderly patients. The nurse plays an important role in promoting heart failure self-care. The process of interaction with the patient can be an important empowering process for self-care behaviour changes. Impact: Process evaluation is an important step in the evaluation of a complex intervention. It allows researchers and practitioners to better understand the mechanism by which an intervention generates impact. Therefore, future intervention programmes can leverage on these mechanisms and adapt them to different contexts for better intervention effectiveness.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang W, Jiang Y, Koh KWL, RAMACHANDRAN HJ, Tay YK, Wu VX, Shorey S

Patients’ Experiences of a Nurse-Led, Home-Based Heart Failure Self-management Program: Findings From a Qualitative Process Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e28216

DOI: 10.2196/28216

PMID: 33904823

PMCID: 8114165

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.