Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2021
Date Accepted: Jun 14, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 3, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Virtual Reality Tour to Reduce Perioperative Anxiety in an Operating Setting Before Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial

Vogt L, Klasen M, Rossaint R, Goeretz U, Ebus P, Sopka S

Virtual Reality Tour to Reduce Perioperative Anxiety in an Operating Setting Before Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e28018

DOI: 10.2196/28018

PMID: 34252034

PMCID: 8444035

Virtual reality tour to reduce perioperative anxiety in an operating setting before anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial

  • Lina Vogt; 
  • Martin Klasen; 
  • Rolf Rossaint; 
  • Ute Goeretz; 
  • Peter Ebus; 
  • Sasa Sopka

ABSTRACT

Background:

Perioperative anxiety is a major burden to patients undergoing surgeries with general anesthesia.

Objective:

The present study investigated whether a virtual operating room tour (VORT) before surgery can be used to ameliorate perioperative anxiety.

Methods:

We employed a randomized parallel group design with two study arms to compare VORT to the standard operation preparation procedure (STOPP). 84 patients were included in the study. A validated inventory (STOA-State) was used to asses perioperative state anxiety before surgery (T1) and after (T2). Trait operation anxiety was evaluated with an additional validated inventory (STOA-Trait). Moreover, user ratings on the usefulness of VORT were assessed with an evaluation questionnaire. Study arms were compared with respect to perioperative state anxiety with independent samples t-tests. To investigate possible associations of perioperative anxiety with perceived usefulness, subjective ratings were correlated with STOA-Trait values.

Results:

No significant differences in state anxiety were determined between VORT and STOPP before and after the surgery. Nonetheless, overall patients’ ratings of VORT were positive, the tour was perceived as useful and therefore showed acceptance for the use of VR. These ratings were unrelated to the degree of perioperative anxiety.

Results:

No significant differences in state anxiety were determined between VORT and STOPP before and after the surgery. Nonetheless, overall patients’ ratings of VORT were positive, the tour was perceived as useful and therefore showed acceptance for the use of VR. These ratings were unrelated to the degree of perioperative anxiety.

Conclusions:

The subjective benefit of VORT could not be explained by a reduction of perioperative anxiety. Instead, VORT appears to serve the need for information and reduce uncertainty. In addition, VORT is perceived as beneficial regardless of the age of the patients. Considering this effect and the manageable organizational and financial effort for implementation, the general use of VORT can be recommended. Clinical Trial: clinicaltrials.gov on 28.09.2020 NCT04579354


 Citation

Please cite as:

Vogt L, Klasen M, Rossaint R, Goeretz U, Ebus P, Sopka S

Virtual Reality Tour to Reduce Perioperative Anxiety in an Operating Setting Before Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e28018

DOI: 10.2196/28018

PMID: 34252034

PMCID: 8444035

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.