Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 10, 2021
Date Accepted: May 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effect of a Consumer-Focused Website for Low Back Pain on Health Literacy, Treatment Choices, and Clinical Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial

Hodges PW, Hall L, Setchell J, French S, Kasza J, Bennell K, Hunter D, Vicenzino B, Crofts S, Dickson C, Ferreira M

Effect of a Consumer-Focused Website for Low Back Pain on Health Literacy, Treatment Choices, and Clinical Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27860

DOI: 10.2196/27860

PMID: 34128822

PMCID: 8277358

Can access to a consumer-focused website for low back pain change health literacy, treatment choices and clinical outcomes? A Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Paul William Hodges; 
  • Leanne Hall; 
  • Jenny Setchell; 
  • Simon French; 
  • Jessica Kasza; 
  • Kim Bennell; 
  • David Hunter; 
  • Bill Vicenzino; 
  • Samuel Crofts; 
  • Chris Dickson; 
  • Manuela Ferreira

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Internet is used for information related to health conditions, including low back pain, but most low back pain websites provide inaccurate information. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of Internet resources to change health literacy or treatment choices.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of MyBackPain website compared to unguided internet use, on health literacy, choice of treatments and clinical outcomes in people with low back pain.

Methods:

This was a pragmatic, online, participant- and assessor-blinded randomized trial of individuals with low back pain stratified by duration. Participants were randomly allocated to have access to the evidence-based MyBackPain website which was designed with input from consumers and expert consensus, or inguided internet use. Co-primary outcomes were two dimensions of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (Dimension 2: ‘having sufficient information to manage my health’; Dimension 3: ‘actively managing my health’, converted to scores 1-100) at three months. Secondary outcomes included additional Health Literacy Questionnaire dimensions, quality of treatment choices, and clinical outcomes.

Results:

453 participants were recruited and 321 (71%) completed primary outcomes. Access to MyBackPain was not superior to unguided internet use on primary outcomes (Dimension 2: mean difference = -0.87 units, 95%CI -3.56 to 1.82; Dimension 3: mean difference = -0.41 units, 95%CI -2.78 to 1.96). Quality of stated treatment choices was improved at 1 month (mean difference = 0.93 units, 95%CI 0.03 to 1.84). Between-group differences in other secondary outcomes had inconsistent direction and unlikely to be clinically important.

Conclusions:

MyBackPain was not superior to unguided internet use for health literacy but may empower users to make better treatment choices in the short-term. Clinical Trial: ACTRN12617001292369 (registered on 7th September 2017).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hodges PW, Hall L, Setchell J, French S, Kasza J, Bennell K, Hunter D, Vicenzino B, Crofts S, Dickson C, Ferreira M

Effect of a Consumer-Focused Website for Low Back Pain on Health Literacy, Treatment Choices, and Clinical Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27860

DOI: 10.2196/27860

PMID: 34128822

PMCID: 8277358

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.