Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Feb 5, 2021
Date Accepted: May 14, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Nursing Students’ Perceptions about Effective Pedagogy: Netnographic Analysis

De Gagne JC, Koppel PD, Park HK, Cadavero A, Cho E, Rushton S, Yamane SS, Manturuk K, Jung D

Nursing Students’ Perceptions about Effective Pedagogy: Netnographic Analysis

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(2):e27736

DOI: 10.2196/27736

PMID: 34156337

PMCID: 8277346

Pedagogy That Makes a Difference: A Netnographic Analysis

  • Jennie C. De Gagne; 
  • Paula D. Koppel; 
  • Hyeyoung K. Park; 
  • Allen Cadavero; 
  • Eunji Cho; 
  • Sharron Rushton; 
  • Sandra S. Yamane; 
  • Kim Manturuk; 
  • Dukyoo Jung

ABSTRACT

Background:

Effective pedagogy that encourages high standards of excellence and commitment to lifelong learning is essential in health professions education to prepare students for real-life challenges such as health disparities and global health issues. Creative learning and innovative teaching strategies empower students with high quality, practical, real-world knowledge and meaningful skills to reach their potential as future health care providers.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to explore health professions students’perceptions of whether their learning experiences were associated with good or bad pedagogy during asynchronous discussion forums. The further objective of the study was to identify how perceptions of best and worst pedagogical practices reflected the students’ values, beliefs, and understanding about factors that made a pedagogy good during their learning history.

Methods:

A netnographic qualitative design was employed in this study. The data were collected on February 3, 2020 by exporting archived data from multiple sessions of a graduate-level nursing course offered between the Fall 2016 and Spring 2020 semesters at a large private university in the southeast region of the United States. Each student was a data unit. As an immersive data operation, field notes were taken by all research members. Data management and analysis were performed with NVivo 12.

Results:

A total of 634 posts were generated by 153 students identified in the dataset. Most of these students were female (88.89%). From the 97 categories identified, four themes emerged: (T) teacher presence built through relationship and communication, (E) environment conducive to affective and cognitive learning, (A) assessment and feedback processes that yield a growth mindset, and (M) mobilization of pedagogy through learner- and community-centeredness.

Conclusions:

The themes that emerged from our analysis confirm findings from previous studies and provide new insights. Our study highlights the value of technology as a tool for effective pedagogy. The resourceful teacher can use various communication techniques to develop meaningful connections between learner and teacher. Styles of communication will vary according to the unique expectations and needs of learners with different learning preferences; however, the aim is to fully engage each learner, establish a rapport between and among students, and nurture an environment characterized by freedom of expression in which ideas flow freely. We suggest that future research continue to explore the influence of differing course formats and pedagogical modalities on student learning experiences. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

De Gagne JC, Koppel PD, Park HK, Cadavero A, Cho E, Rushton S, Yamane SS, Manturuk K, Jung D

Nursing Students’ Perceptions about Effective Pedagogy: Netnographic Analysis

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(2):e27736

DOI: 10.2196/27736

PMID: 34156337

PMCID: 8277346

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.