Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 2, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 15, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: Pooled Analysis Study

Chen PC, Ru LY, Chang CC, Kang YN

The Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: Pooled Analysis Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(5):e27694

DOI: 10.2196/27694

PMID: 35576561

PMCID: 9152716

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: A pooled analysis of 11685 cases

  • Pei-Chin Chen; 
  • Lu-Yun Ru; 
  • Chun-Chao Chang; 
  • Yi-No Kang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence (AI) for gastric cancer diagnosis had been discussed in recent years. Role of AI in early gastric cancer is more important than in advanced gastric cancer since early gastric cancer is not easily identified in clinical practice, but to our knowledge, past syntheses appear to have limited focus on the population with early gastric cancer. Therefore, the purpose of this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) on the diagnosis of early gastric cancer from endoscopic images.

Objective:

Therefore, the purpose of this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) on the diagnosis of early gastric cancer from endoscopic images.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review from database inception to June, 2020 of all studies assessing the performance of AI in the endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Studies not concerning early gastric cancer were excluded. The outcome of interest was the diagnostic accuracy (comprising sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) of AI systems. Study quality was assessed on the basis of the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Meta-analysis was primarily based on a bivariate mixed-effects model. A summary receiver operating curve and a hierarchical summary receiver operating curve were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was computed.

Results:

We analyzed 12 retrospective case–control studies (n = 11685) in which AI identified early gastric cancer from endoscopic images. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AI for early gastric cancer diagnosis were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–0.92) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84–0.93), respectively. The AUC was 0.94. Sensitivity analysis of studies using support vector machines and narrow-band imaging demonstrated more consistent results.

Conclusions:

For early gastric cancer, to our knowledge, this was the first synthesis study on the use of endoscopic images in AI in diagnosis. AI may support diagnosis of early gastric cancer. However, the collocation of imaging techniques and optimal algorithms remain unclear. Competing models of AI on the diagnosis of early gastric cancer are worthy of future investigation. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO: CRD42020193223


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chen PC, Ru LY, Chang CC, Kang YN

The Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: Pooled Analysis Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(5):e27694

DOI: 10.2196/27694

PMID: 35576561

PMCID: 9152716

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.