Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jan 28, 2021
Date Accepted: Jun 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study

Keniston A, McBeth L, Pell J, Bowden K, Metzger A, Nordhagen J, Anthony A, Rice J, Burden M

The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(4):e27568

DOI: 10.2196/27568

PMID: 34747702

PMCID: 8663627

Discharge Today: The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary electronic discharge readiness tool

  • Angela Keniston; 
  • Lauren McBeth; 
  • Jonathan Pell; 
  • Kasey Bowden; 
  • Anna Metzger; 
  • Jamie Nordhagen; 
  • Amanda Anthony; 
  • John Rice; 
  • Marisha Burden

ABSTRACT

Background:

In the face of hospital capacity strain, hospitals have built multifaceted plans to try to improve patient flow. Many of these initiatives have focused on the timing of discharges and lowering length of stay and have been met with variable success. We deployed a novel discharge communication tool in the electronic health record (EHR) to enhance communication around discharge.

Objective:

Evaluate the effectiveness of a discharge communication tool

Methods:

We conducted a prospective, single center, quasi-experimental, pre-post study with Hospitalist physicians and advanced practice providers to evaluate the Discharge Today Tool, an electronic health record (EHR) communication tool. We assessed adoption of the tool as well as the usability of and experience with Hospital Medicine physicians, advanced practice providers, nursing, care management, and other clinical staff during the pilot implementation period. In addition, using multivariable mixed modeling, we compared discharge order time, discharge time, and length of stay during a pre-implementation period (October 1, 2018 to March 4, 2019), the pilot implementation period (March 5, 2019 to July 31, 2019), and a post-implementation maintenance period (August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019).

Results:

During the pilot implementation period, from March 5, 2019 to July 31, 2019, 4,707 patients were discharged (compared to 4,558 patients discharged during the pre-implementation period). Three hundred and fifty-two clinical staff had wrenched in the tool and 85% percent of patients during the pilot period had a discharge status assigned at least once. In a survey of hospital medicine providers and clinical staff, the majority of respondents reported that the tool was helpful and either saved time or did not add additional time to their workflow. Although improvements were not observed in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses, after including starting morning census per team as an effect modifier, there was a reduction in the time of day the discharge order was entered into the EHR by the discharging physician and in the time of day the patient left the hospital (decrease of 2.9 minutes per additional patient, P=0.07 and 3 minutes per additional patient, P=0.07, respectively). After adding teams staffed with an advanced practice provider (APP) as an effect modifier, for teams that included an APP, there was a significant reduction in the time of day the patient left the hospital beyond the reduction seen for teams without an APP (decrease of 19.1 minutes per patient, P=0.04). Finally, in adjusted analysis, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 3.7% (P=0.06).

Conclusions:

The Discharge Today tool allows for real-time documentation and sharing of discharge status. Our results suggest an overall positive response by care team members and that the tool may be useful for improving discharge time and length of stay if a team is staffed with advanced practice provider (APP) or in higher census situations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Keniston A, McBeth L, Pell J, Bowden K, Metzger A, Nordhagen J, Anthony A, Rice J, Burden M

The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(4):e27568

DOI: 10.2196/27568

PMID: 34747702

PMCID: 8663627

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.