Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jan 27, 2021
Date Accepted: May 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Relation Classification for Bleeding Events From Electronic Health Records Using Deep Learning Systems: An Empirical Study

Mitra A, Rawat BPS, McManus DD, Yu H

Relation Classification for Bleeding Events From Electronic Health Records Using Deep Learning Systems: An Empirical Study

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(7):e27527

DOI: 10.2196/27527

PMID: 34255697

PMCID: 8285744

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Relation Classification for Bleeding Events from Electronic Health Records: Exploration of Deep Learning Systems

  • Avijit Mitra; 
  • Bhanu Pratap Singh Rawat; 
  • David D McManus; 
  • Hong Yu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Accurate detection of bleeding events from electronic health records (EHR) is crucial for identifying and characterizing different common and serious medical problems. To extract such information from EHRs, it is essential to identify the relations between bleeding events and related clinical entities (e.g., bleeding anatomic sites, lab tests). With the advent of natural language processing (NLP) and deep learning (DL) based techniques, many studies have focused on their applicability for various clinical applications. However, there has been no prior work that utilized deep learning to extract relations between bleeding events and relevant entities.

Objective:

In this study, we aim to evaluate multiple deep learning systems on a novel EHR dataset for bleeding event related relation classification.

Methods:

We first expert-annotated a new dataset of 1283 de-identified EHR notes for bleeding events and their attributes. On this dataset, we evaluated three state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, namely, convolutional neural network (CNN), graph convolutional network with attention (AGGCN) and BERT-based models (BioBERT, Bio+Clinical BERT and EhrBERT) for bleeding event relation classification task.

Results:

Our experiments show that the BERT-based models significantly outperformed CNN and AGGCN. Specifically, BioBERT achieved a macro F1 score of 0.842, outperforming both AGGCN (macro F1 score, 0.828) and CNN (macro F1 score, 0.763) by 1.4% (P<.001) and 7.9% (P<.001) respectively.

Conclusions:

In this comprehensive study, we explored and compared different DL systems to classify relations between bleeding events and other medical concepts. On our corpus, BERT-based models outperformed other deep learning models for identifying the relations of bleeding related entities. BERT-based models were benefited from their pre-trained contextualized word representation and the use of target entity representation over traditional sequence representation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mitra A, Rawat BPS, McManus DD, Yu H

Relation Classification for Bleeding Events From Electronic Health Records Using Deep Learning Systems: An Empirical Study

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(7):e27527

DOI: 10.2196/27527

PMID: 34255697

PMCID: 8285744

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.